IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 26 March 2024 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266B5C14F60E for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.159
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="SiGFkwKA"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="Amo4PtTP"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GJW_4RmoU-Id for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2283FC14F602 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25032 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2024 15:12:58 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=61c56602e5fa.k2403; bh=/He//3inK+s0dz9RU5bI1/i0STxRyaIrdj0S3YxVMbY=; b=SiGFkwKAxwL6azZY/yuiLYsWqDVxcpLBbRNRdlNYdb3mkAGIFDsEr9V16WqYXYb6tPdxuwqhhFT42xrrde+MXbyW+geXYNKICGamAGAGzNOj5+h5iL5/7C9nLpcNZ2L2A5qwcuzLgEmcJtXsbnDdYRb1gWBPbJ7137iQM8jnLEgLXiede2tP8rFzLW8JW22yVzvjENI/rJlZbtIOGFao6TW/KLmcbGnUv2eggU9IkXZQkMUlW7hb+JvuneqsntVRrGJG9KnwsJxayGyNKD2r8VfDIkmdlXJge51nsrX12kk5tSNt5aj3QsmjEQpdDtCOSGxN/MpxF2RKDz/WcBLstA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=61c56602e5fa.k2403; bh=/He//3inK+s0dz9RU5bI1/i0STxRyaIrdj0S3YxVMbY=; b=Amo4PtTP1f7x//c4cY5Of9tfXvN3IEbEd11ue+9vFGu9mpKQ+PzVpuZI4LlAb36317j1NTMkS+dVrh8cATzzP0yNjzkqiQUHidt1TfTPANRSoXHDHY3JiT6T0tvhrtFiRMW2OOARn9aPq0ZEUEsElDpcBaLLJohhiVyjBpnJWSb4O98u/W1KVJVToC73T7zbqTA0GxfC2X4vj3uNSXSFqgrXGK3iCelEep0QyzJwR/XYNISx02m46kBiVmELDGsY61RDN6VV9CjQEtl+wO9malaxXDHVLn8aV14AQxKg7w7H/GwIVkWLM+OIgtWQY2FamsNCdRW7jYxv6ihx0UMbGg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 26 Mar 2024 15:12:58 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 994568631238; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:12:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:12:57 -0400
Message-Id: <20240326151257.994568631238@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Cc: ggm@algebras.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn31ijs9XiQJZprD_69EanzvBLb--yQTRrB1nVS7JcRsSA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/ZAu8n2Pv7b7V6Q1PHAzFEVX_TuQ>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:13:11 -0000

It appears that George Michaelson  <ggm@algebras.org> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Is any Asian destination better?
>
>Is that an Ottawa problem or a generic "eastern United states" problem?

There are flights from Toronto, New York, Washington, and Atlanta to
Tokyo and Seoul, and a 16 hr flight from New York or Toronto to Hong Kong.
There is a 19 hour flight from New York to Singapore, premium economy
and biz class only. HKG and SIN take longer now that they can't fly
over Russia.

Other than that, east Asia requires connecting in one of those cities
or on the west coast of North America.

Ottawa is a secondary airport with less than great connections. As
Mike noted, it's often easier to go to Montreal or Toronto instead.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email