IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Mon, 25 March 2024 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC26EC1CAF42 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2b-qwbTSc2Tv for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (mx4.open-xchange.com [87.191.57.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88559C151981 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B58E86A0ED; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:19:05 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1711387145; bh=JM8ZUPs1ySmM2w0rCcZeP2rOXvT/x8WsJA7Y6GQ8ZsM=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=7x83qDeWWAvnjPU2ViSm01lZzjRF6phPPvN7tBrOV8doxylJ/G3rMMVr9qtHMuMay c2bjS+m3USEg7WaST91N2+PT6IyihkJmuCT/ix6ANFHj1IRy/8m+dmo4llkf8VRUiw NBTsMybcG9o0HOIZzlK//vq7Sj/L+XPsz2PLMDcJsBFJl0mKLdpM7LALQjXbEDnjuS FIJbl5TZhABlGqmZ1WkZ4zm7Xz2VcQubbvYFSkv5QhKnc2PQ97TOoe31/quONBU9xn LxF6pO3uu/7BVLBe9ys9bOOnFV+QCUznxh9gUX62y08wA5FEgrDYKGd1rZq9n6PZkp j9Bw1Q6QImayA==
Received: from appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com ([10.20.28.82]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id IcPuKgmyAWY8bhYA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>); Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:19:05 +0100
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:19:05 +0100
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1996148042.129465.1711387145676@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <383149.1711340175@dyas>
References: <ZgCdcWGzgESGxj8v@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <383149.1711340175@dyas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev59
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Autocrypt: addr=vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFhFR+UBCACfoywFKBRfzasiiR9/6dwY36eLePXcdScumDMR8qoXvRS55QYDjp5bs+yMq41qWV9 xp/cqryY9jnvHbeF3TsE5yEazpD1dleRbkpElUBpPwXqkrSP8uXO9KkS9KoX6gdml6M4L+F82WpqYC1 uTzOE6HPmhmQ4cGSgoia2jolxAhRpzoYN99/BwpvoZeTSLP5K6yPlMPYkMev/uZlAkMMhelli9IN6yA yxcC0AeHSnOAcNKUr13yXyMlTyi1cdMJ4sk88zIbefxwg3PAtYjkz3wgvP96cNVwAgSt4+j/ZuVaENP pgVuM512m051j9SlspWDHtzrci5pBKKFsibnTelrABEBAAG0NUJlcnRvbGEsIFZpdHRvcmlvIDx2aXR 0b3Jpby5iZXJ0b2xhQG9wZW4teGNoYW5nZS5jb20+iQFABBMBAgAqBAsJCAcGFQoJCAsCBRYCAwEAAp 4BAhsDBYkSzAMABQMAAAAABYJYRUflAAoJEIU2cHmzj8qNaG0H/ROY+suCP86hoN+9RIV66Ej8b3sb8 UgwFJOJMupZfeb9yTIJwE4VQT5lTt146CcJJ5jvxD6FZn1Htw9y4/45pPAF7xLE066jg3OqRvzeWRZ3 IDUfJJIiM5YGk1xWxDqppSwhnKcMOuI72iioWxX0nGQrWxpnWJsjt08IEEwuYucDkul1PHsrLJbTd58 fiMKLVwag+IE1SPHOwkPF6arZQZIfB5ThtOZV+36Jn8Hok9XfeXWBVyPkiWCQYVX39QsIbr0JNR9kQy 4g2ZFexOcTe8Jo12jPRL7V8OqStdDes3cje9lWFLnX05nrfLuE0l0JKWEg8akN+McFXc+oV68h7nu5A Q0EWEVH5QEIAIDKanNBe1uRfk8AjLirflZO291VNkOAeUu+dIhecGnZeQW6htlDinlYOnXhtsY1mK9W PUu+xshDq7lXn2G0LxldYwyJYZaJtDgIKqVqwxfA34Lj27oqPuXwcvGhdCgt0SW/YcalRdAi0/AzUCu 5GSaj2kaGUSnBYYUP4szGJXjaK2psP5toQSCtx2pfSXQ6MaqPK9Zzy+D5xc6VWQRp/iRImodAcPf8fg JJvRyJ8Jla3lKWyvBBzJDg6MOf6Fts78bJSt23X0uPp93g7GgbYkuRMnFI4RGoTVkxjD/HBEJ0CNg22 hoHJondhmKnZVrHEluFuSnW0wBEIYomcPSPB+cAEQEAAYkBMQQYAQIAGwUCWEVH5QIbDAQLCQgHBhUK CQgLAgUJEswDAAAKCRCFNnB5s4/KjdO8B/wNpvWtOpLdotR/Xh4fu08Fd63nnNfbIGIETWsVi0Sbr8i E5duuGaaWIcMmUvgKe/BM0Fpj9X01Zjm90uoPrlVVuQWrf+vFlbalUYVZr51gl5UyUFHk+iAZCAA0WB rsmACKvuV1P7GuiX3UV9b59T9taYJxN3dNFuftrEuvsqHimFtlekUjUwoCekTJdncFusBhwz2OrKhHr WWrEsXkfh0+pURWYAlKlTxvXuI7gAfHEQM+6OnrWvXYtlhd0M1sBPnCjbyG63Qws7Rek9bEWKtH6dA6 dmT2FQT+g1S9Mdf0WkPTQNX0x24dm8IoHuD3KYwX7Svx43Xa17aZnXqUjtj1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/LN9i5Sqt_0TDlgwNL-v2GLVw_JE>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:19:13 -0000


> Il 25/03/2024 05:16 CET Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> ha scritto:
> 
>     > Who will atually determine if Brisbane was a success to be repeted, and if so how ?
> 
> LLC+IESG.

In a way, this was a good test for a meeting in which we accept reduced onsite participation in exchange for going to a part of the world where we don't go often or we never went. I loved this meeting and I would consider it a success, and I would welcome more of these "experiments", even if they entail a drop in onsite numbers.

> I think that the right people to ask are the asians.
> Was the trip from Tokyo or Nanjing or India significant more pleasant for you
> than when we for instance, meet in Prague or Philadelpha/Montreal?
> 
> Clearly, it is unpleasant for Europeans and east-coastians to get to
> Australia (or Bangkok). 

Well, no, as a European I can tell you that the two destinations are completely different. Bangkok, or more or less any major city in South-East and East Asia, is a single 10-12 hour flight away from Europe if you have a direct service, or a bit more if you need to connect; in any case, it's not further away than the U.S. West Coast. Australia took me two days to go and two days to get back.

-- 
Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com 
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email