Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?
George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Tue, 26 March 2024 10:07 UTC
Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21346C14F61B for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EppHWwWbjSot for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3AD5C14F60E for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3c3d3710018so795668b6e.0 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1711447623; x=1712052423; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GdzHuhunj0J6xYOQbzFIOUdnDO4WERy2PcEKc7L1J5g=; b=Wy2AfRQ20BGsWU6Kzl0FSjZ3nat0xmif51sc+j1FfhVurSUtjJYaNXvPGaA/m3S3OL Zgp6600kvgkpdDKK/N1B+vFM5KTp278Zvfd5NAaSG2EVYBlkAh88lUIRsCUeasybQdVM xEMgpnuNj4XNc32c+sTWdvU6rDXKHoOxVvq16moVsjBE655s18+Il+EfFlR1NTW9ZGz4 huF/8GfMAstAf4X35KOsNjtC1h1GNK3fpmuGGgcMlgULek/CI4Ev+DhLRWJsJZ2I/wCW piNXekKVzZIU+nm63AErX2Hx8TuJCQPvMkx7OL2aA0T3U0jvvXv3CQm5gmzg3wOq4rFu zPPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711447623; x=1712052423; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GdzHuhunj0J6xYOQbzFIOUdnDO4WERy2PcEKc7L1J5g=; b=B4V0pXFjjOBTckTlwDSwcHazX0rAc48lLpg9ltXHqPS8Nhck8YoJfa+tSBca2r6TaQ rutDCtJFOxl+pazkqCR6gmRQ+3vuod9UtYsR1sR1TMOKEtQrDwP0LW1Rqu/uHsedOKLc CXixg+hk624L7MZWv04t4OT1L7xQnTVZVySL0XmMlw393k5ZlCQXiCq1+AXYPnVMUCTy SDy/kYHkKVkgXvMR7ZfPuuosEK6/B/8NzayiCn5NxevHU4M817owIoH4qcFVfPRDW+Se r3dEytoMhJyFmTMjXbxvmEWL1hbse5s7a7NFdT15OBaXMoypmsHQpGbl51MXL2H1vnj+ Ci7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwPn8pzk5GjtlWdujL0INENFVzB3bd01gvvFA8GIc/KaHMXbv8k AmU0SkG0IymoAEpm3qTWNIFpVn/um5k/JyTHSPNFeRqRI02AbKK2ccjM7a8jWYlfkARBxk2RBiq Pql6/8Qp/61YiraW0fSI15D+J9cf5s3pOX3u8SswyEDwGAYAe
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHvf+HHvOO8ZD4pYJ4179wqXb7HopGyPfQbsc2EFOzMh2QWrHhbqeokj/1ahkRA3IqAufjd0S+meFMbpTbgmKA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:3c88:b0:3c3:c090:5aee with SMTP id gs8-20020a0568083c8800b003c3c0905aeemr904481oib.0.1711447622904; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ZgCdcWGzgESGxj8v@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <383149.1711340175@dyas> <1996148042.129465.1711387145676@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <424877.1711396612@dyas>
In-Reply-To: <424877.1711396612@dyas>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:06:51 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn31ijs9XiQJZprD_69EanzvBLb--yQTRrB1nVS7JcRsSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009d896c06148d7372"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/XyhWdXDwELdcPXz5bQgddbV2VJQ>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:07:07 -0000
Is any Asian destination better? Is that an Ottawa problem or a generic "eastern United states" problem? G
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… John Levine
- [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… George Michaelson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… George Michaelson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Jay Daley
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Jay Daley
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… John Levine