IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 26 March 2024 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3848DC1CAF23 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.66
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCFuC5sAkG1Y for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D88C1C637B for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V3YGJ090GznkS6; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:12:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4V3YGH6ny6zknCb; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:12:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:12:07 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
Message-ID: <ZgIu9_zNkgLukU6I@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <ZgCdcWGzgESGxj8v@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <383149.1711340175@dyas> <2E1FD6C8-3940-4CEA-B0BB-5AAAE6A56F59@dkutscher.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2E1FD6C8-3940-4CEA-B0BB-5AAAE6A56F59@dkutscher.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/uRPMj3BXO-O4R2Na9tMkQK5RTE0>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:12:19 -0000

Thanks, Dirk

But did it work out equally productive to you wrt to people you wanted to meet with in person ?

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 09:45:54AM +0800, Dirk Kutscher wrote:
> > I think that the right people to ask are the asians.
> > Was the trip from Tokyo or Nanjing or India significant more pleasant for you
> > than when we for instance, meet in Prague or Philadelpha/Montreal?
> 
> Yep, Brisbane was a direct 8 hours flight from Hong Kong that felt like a short flight compared to all the other trips to Europe and North America.
> 
> Some had to transfer in Sydney, I heard.
> 
> Personally, I found it a great place for a meeting and would definitely not mind coming back at some point.
> 
> Best regards,
> Dirk

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email