Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions
Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Wed, 06 September 2017 17:57 UTC
Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAAE132494; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2GgUpM-H5aRX; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0127.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56977132055; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=sYooAI+SO1vEoHZnyD9TBjibxkZlovD/YP88IMBVyHo=; b=U26JA1In6wrglqeRG3PaXYN84Zsp/o/kIV2GvBM/igSVlcFEiaeKjkRkijBkqnCHavjuAVPYUBqymFrcWs9we3ei9CQ1U3I9ru1wGt6VuWdasHkYN2kGuqNEKi/GscM7zYzJlevGdRDdFD/8SnWJrYYhIZDQQQ3miyhjJsSB7S0=
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) by BN3PR0501MB1266.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.183.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.56.4; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:57:06 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) with mapi id 15.20.0035.010; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:57:06 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
CC: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "bclaise@cisco.com" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "netconf-chairs@ietf.org" <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] upcoming adoptions
Thread-Index: AQHTISEQvmg9jr+3gUCv+5ltP9XhHqKl6moAgAANOICAAP0JAIAAf2MAgAAqCYCAAGgzAP//54AA
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 17:57:06 +0000
Message-ID: <A57EC752-3E23-4E8E-A802-C7CDD37A3DD1@juniper.net>
References: <3620aafe-bc72-cc54-9dbd-b687a0178df2@cisco.com> <20170905.095949.1829098658779783521.mbj@tail-f.com> <CABCOCHRmNT=v9ivztzPh3OGmo-AeheHDct2XY9zbk_-FjEytmg@mail.gmail.com> <20170906.084124.2282926097915349446.mbj@tail-f.com> <38E666E2-EECE-4554-9A55-B98D829EB4CA@juniper.net> <CABCOCHQ-bBe307BgXJtxKOW3avmdkck4qrmj-oHTdmaRD5pU_w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHQ-bBe307BgXJtxKOW3avmdkck4qrmj-oHTdmaRD5pU_w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1266; 6:mGrnyjUVvTGJKlYTD9exs3WPPJQzs1Y+bh9kvDWHwIGMqzY4aEW0qPwMJUBaLL8FoZ4TnVCzW+BhVQK3tvEtrehZ5D64vfcRHf9aZ/Fv/ZHaQaU6ViNso9TUXfb9ZzFBPIiqKW0elUUmlvjY4y+WEJF81CWfO0MRsoZ09bISAChazJH3dZSi+JD/TEHyyJ5m86kn4W6oy8g1w9qJapL4ZjSE+Pp/hZy3sH5xK6q28NpiGi9P3k9TkicGAz13S5lgPMsdjQ47jHbk8NtKzlEPPuDCAddpIuBXefwpReOs57rlGaLPjB9crTqkMH38hSUXpEjFba/QkZLbvyJpY5eyhw==; 5:eXWF0pziCsvprnhmSDL2KvdpV2P5FebV0k1rrBUkv1r0w0sDs8Ku+rS5Hi7sK3uEAh9oRw4DaFZHdpeE2iRS9kdu8cHxqUtukvvwMI5NWqvQIY6cdo3hBWv2WZHw798ctvY76/AHW3dW6kdGpwqOgw==; 24:/yPcr91sYROpwxBZij+ylLdcxri6X9gQndKA5PeZXt0mps0u8Ok5dH77QG5qDSwAmmSRZfM5TUnaiMbGojHgo6OQtQTsqftpPlB00uZO7xc=; 7:PfeAHZq5n83zmyaeyTmdhFh6HPD7pCGAw7o+tQiXGNk/LLXK2Ycoeeg5hrVOk8x6EV7MCHPECM/MrWV9Vp3hz2QcEKm49CROgXFCt1wdq65q0+xosKIxTRkmx4MFYpo+nt/XRuajAF9kmVWVslkym1g5CKT54bS+saVjIAPfqsWqRPebiykWkT1bmu0nnEe+zOIxaShIDneC1yHjo6r7eBZJfWi4vHvHou/BYv4hMoM=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1f6c614f-2fd9-483e-1e31-08d4f550b043
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254152)(48565401081)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603199)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1266;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR0501MB1266:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0501MB1266B7319766951B0C3090B1A5970@BN3PR0501MB1266.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(100000703101)(100105400095)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560025)(20161123558100)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1266; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1266;
x-forefront-prvs: 0422860ED4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39860400002)(189002)(199003)(2906002)(82746002)(50986999)(86362001)(54356999)(76176999)(66066001)(106356001)(105586002)(8936002)(36756003)(93886005)(81166006)(8676002)(81156014)(478600001)(68736007)(2950100002)(229853002)(6916009)(189998001)(101416001)(3846002)(33656002)(7736002)(305945005)(83716003)(99286003)(54906002)(25786009)(97736004)(3280700002)(14454004)(2900100001)(102836003)(6116002)(110136004)(4326008)(6506006)(5660300001)(77096006)(6486002)(3660700001)(4001350100001)(6512007)(53936002)(6246003)(83506001)(6436002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1266; H:BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C04B3C4D7B94F145848CBB405C1ADA1F@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Sep 2017 17:57:06.8053 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1266
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/EgI56T8bWTs3eSNeTXwPvQtYfwA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 17:57:10 -0000
>> /netconf-state and /restconf-state don't seem to follow the general >> pattern we're correcting with the various NMDA updates. Particularly, >> these -state trees are NOT for the purpose to providing the opstate >> value for configured nodes. These modules have the misfortune of >> having "-state" in their name, but they're otherwise fine. > > > This contradicts some details we have been told about NMDA > > 1) the transition guidelines say otherwise > > New modules and modules that are not concerned with the > operational state of configuration information SHOULD > immediately be structured to be NMDA-compatible Yes, I'm suggesting we give ourselves some leeway, by taking advantage of the SHOULD keyword above and defer updating these two modules to when it makes more sense to do so. > 2) RD defines operational state to include config=false nodes > such as counters, so these modules are properly named. module-name == top-level node name. Either way, my point is that the -state tree in these modules is not trying to provide the opstate value for configured nodes (i.e. applied configuration). K.
- [netmod] ietf-routing or ietf-routing-2? module n… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions - this appendix i… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions - this appendix i… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions - this appendix i… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions - this appendix i… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions - this appendix i… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions - this appendix i… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions - this appendix i… Benoit Claise
- [netmod] upcoming adoptions Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions t.petch
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions - this appendix i… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions - this appendix i… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] ietf-routing or ietf-routing-2? modu… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] ietf-routing or ietf-routing-2? modu… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] ietf-routing or ietf-routing-2? modu… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] ietf-routing or ietf-routing-2? modu… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] ietf-routing or ietf-routing-2? modu… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] ietf-routing or ietf-routing-2? modu… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] ietf-routing or ietf-routing-2? modu… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] [Rtg-dt-yang-arch] ietf-routing or i… Lou Berger