Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 30 August 2017 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA71133061 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 04:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id por_Rq7rC-G7 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 04:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7292133059 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 04:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1458; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1504094017; x=1505303617; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=C6sQpoL9m4RLJ7QGgvy25Qgco/XyWr2nBN9evPmzrJ4=; b=R3W7/Ub6Nk/LQbSfYtUfWdZd5vsfU/AOMpfDOpplpGtRbrT4FVMVJhM6 N2mZN9Kms7aMlHYtcJdN59Zj9dxNdD0TBpatgNdxKl5/RoI2KCG3uA5Dx JoZOexnQD1YRWGzMjp9eot5VzHUPNBsYBSXcdn+GdA+/cDogvgj72Nsz3 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0A6AQDxpqZZ/5xdJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1pkgRUHg3CKHpAagXGWJw6CBCyFGwIahAo/GAECAQEBAQEBAWs?= =?us-ascii?q?ohRkBBSMRRRACAQgOCgICJgICAjAVEAIEDgWKMRCtCIIni0YBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYENgh2CAoMxgyiEXYMrgmEFoGwCh1eMc4ISiWSGdZZCAR8?= =?us-ascii?q?4gQ13FYdkdolegQ8BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,448,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="473971844"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Aug 2017 11:53:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7UBra8M028404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:53:37 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:53:36 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:53:36 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] upcoming adoptions
Thread-Index: AQHTISEQvmg9jr+3gUCv+5ltP9XhHqKc9jWA///UrAA=
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:53:36 +0000
Message-ID: <D5CC1E2A.C4EB4%acee@cisco.com>
References: <14299503-509D-43BE-A938-0B7B88C3B249@juniper.net> <20170830.122823.2236525312698458242.mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170830.122823.2236525312698458242.mbj@tail-f.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <03E732358FA01447BA1950106B706473@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/XHl_qJtolFDNBgsSn9wO2larl-Y>
Subject: Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:53:39 -0000

Hi Martin, 

On 8/30/17, 6:28 AM, "Martin Bjorklund" <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
>> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-00
>
>I found some trivial errors in this draft:
>
>  o  The revision for ietf-routing doesn't match the filename's date.
>
>  o  The filename for ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements is wrong (last
>     "s" is missing)
>
>  o  All the old -state definitions are removed, rather than being
>     marked as "deprecated".


I’m glad you brought this up. We discussed this in the Routing YANG Design
Team and were planning to discuss it on a wide scale.

One of the advantages of the NMDA is that it makes the models easier to
read and consume. This is somewhat negated if we have to retain all these
data nodes in the associated modules and mark them as “deprecated”. What
is the consequence of not including them? They are available in the
previous version of the model if they are need for compatibility.

Thanks,
Acee 


>
>
>/martin