Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 14 September 2017 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1542B132A1A for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id isfpwJOHD_ju for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [70.40.196.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A75C71326DF for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CMOut01 (unknown [10.0.90.82]) by gproxy7.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62E72199A2 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:49:54 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 9Rpq1w00W2SSUrH01RptF3; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:49:54 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=K4VSJ2eI c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=2JCJgTwv5E4A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=t9dDAhW7IYLHEqmpU88A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Mu2MFYMmrFUgTP85RfiuP8TlbJ/RxPXsOprx8nFnZuQ=; b=XpL6lr8FYG/F+HJMSt3Nccu6rX TvKIsVwZbtzutPLTiUkg1kJkGTCevsQXjPoef1UeBa8Cg/Ee53lV3h6G2IlSyuxUpydn5l++DDcl+ s4VVrcL/GO7GzF+KIY1FohllF;
Received: from pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.84.20]:52572 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1dsUWc-000dzh-OZ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:49:50 -0600
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <14299503-509D-43BE-A938-0B7B88C3B249@juniper.net> <36ba3d4b-1ae1-0666-12cf-db41e172924b@cisco.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <75739d75-da96-b340-2403-d0949ac54ed7@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:49:48 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <36ba3d4b-1ae1-0666-12cf-db41e172924b@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.84.20
X-Exim-ID: 1dsUWc-000dzh-OZ
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.84.20]:52572
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/xYfXQ_22cW5gCCCCavrHNddHXDU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:53:42 -0000

Hi Rob,

On 9/14/2017 9:37 AM, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi Kent & Lou,
>
> When do you think that it will be possible to start the adoption process 
> on these drafts?
>
> I think that the first two at least would seem to be ready for 
> adoption.  For the 3rd draft, there still seems to be an open question 
> of what to do with the old state tree, but presumably that could be 
> solved after the draft has been adopted?
I see an update for the third was published yesterday
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02)  that
clarifies the intent is to replace the current modules, and presumably
obsolete 8022.  And now that this intended direction is clear in the
draft we could poll it.

I think this still doesn't address if we need to indicate that the
rfc8022 defined modules are deprecated by some other mechanisms than
just replacing the RFC, e.g., by updating the old modules with all nodes
marked as deprecated.  I think you're right that this could be done post
adoption.  Of course others are free to disagree.

I check with Kent and see what he thinks.

Thanks,
Lou

>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
>
> On 30/08/2017 00:46, Kent Watsen wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> As discussed at the last meeting, we are heading to revising existing RFCs to align them with NMDA.  The first batch have been published as individual drafts:
>>
>> 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00
>> 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00
>> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-00
>>
>> Please take a look (comments welcome!) and stay tuned for the related adoption calls.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kent (and Lou)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> .
>>
>