IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification

Bastian Hofmann <bashofmann@googlemail.com> Fri, 24 September 2010 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bashofmann@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7489E3A6B50 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jNib9XG2VouX for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 04:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A950D3A6B43 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 04:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1960566fxm.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 04:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+m6XyYzyC45lf7A3ULnrcfsYFQG5E37QcMo1uQazhM8=; b=ia4eC7IcpkEqdxLmQPaPKG47c3S65I7+gTorHVyxlHwqi2HSlhWKqRCn0QwuhXXda9 fPEeoJ+zd/q2Vt6epq/uJ08SsC02Qg48qB/hl9LLxu2BsZ6cKO4/itCIvOu0UAVAwphE BBlmoc1vz2BVHTKnTxoN5gJm/32qi5ykY4Jw8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Trjc8w9kpmOWfQQER4xVbcthj/KPo/n9rDmH8lgGHtFNibmNKNDY/K2Av/NVkG/HAy g2fZTW4/pwqGGeOVNyQjSOJwFE/N2wQAIyrKS4aJfmrVTU5dU215FSqQE46zCM4LU54w NTIAvzdj4DrWGb/bPBo2tN3QuJ6/bsqD2aJPs=
Received: by 10.239.154.196 with SMTP id f4mr174810hbc.49.1285327348535; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 04:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.165.2 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 04:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
References: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
From: Bastian Hofmann <bashofmann@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:22:08 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTinM8navP8CKQ6c6QmGwji-gZz2+5nJpVRULhnL4@mail.gmail.com>
To: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:21:59 -0000

+1

2010/9/24 Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>:
> Since much of this recent debate was done off list, I'd like to ask people
> to simply express their support or objection to including a basic signature
> feature in the core spec, in line with the 1.0a signature approach.
>
> This is not a vote, just taking the temperature of the group.
>
> EHL
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email