IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Fri, 24 September 2010 01:43 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0ED93A68FA for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.492
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kq-tUKeQotN0 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DE2D93A6804 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22796 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2010 01:43:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.19) by p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 24 Sep 2010 01:43:37 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.20]) by P3PW5EX1HT001.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.19]) with mapi; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:43:36 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:43:35 -0700
Thread-Topic: Basic signature support in the core specification
Thread-Index: Actbiea9Kvc91oocXkChShLMRTSOPw==
Message-ID: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:43:08 -0000

Since much of this recent debate was done off list, I'd like to ask people
to simply express their support or objection to including a basic signature
feature in the core spec, in line with the 1.0a signature approach.

This is not a vote, just taking the temperature of the group.

EHL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email