IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor

"Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Thu, 12 July 2018 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658F1130EE7 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cgo8_hnI6Ypi for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BC0130E89 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u21-v6so15767485qku.2 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9QkbqjIRNUfg6Ce6QjcgeF34sLha+ROFpLH2RVmOEWo=; b=GQnY8i0eGzbIQoaAl34CC9UnuApn4zg9piMXhCKwjyzy3WSRC3bx7x6Cfs/+cw0n87 dFNZpVXncVowbI0Sk5kYSHv9cnEy7shSaLWZEwk5pH0dczzRjq4oOdNsDzHpP0WvZpYu KIU/n8d1tlB/uq3S4k5JKxDHCP+GsiS9OoVGhEQrFhX2U+Qd7+vZbMdYjQ720GEo2L/C U3/Czr1+U7Me8pk+FBsIDOvjjqJ3PC9giwXaqNffPcAD3zpHNqKZOjIUw4s/vEXGd6Bk jlqdPSbq1jtzeQlOPpVkwyok15GOlMOs5H6PmoJD8pN1BD1AcHYMvmYeDHMF1RJpS0ql xIOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9QkbqjIRNUfg6Ce6QjcgeF34sLha+ROFpLH2RVmOEWo=; b=S1+G42Z3B32z8yGIVmmzm0i9lp1ANF4jVuyAZskJwBQRCmcyG70LWmnP9mzK4oNh/S pIsnd8sCVHgK3Za2FQjqMUdNvxPKueJs11teedwZIa2Xp5hZa0vaK0OcsPMGX2qCgSJW Syb0B0lhgAHX9gJ2BZhRIekZOj/wPM5zuwed0DqUAx4u4TCS1fFxgvuwGBlzvvSK4RdH IgfPGO8vMOScCq559EgOTBOcNSEHIrOzxplQMZLvES5uBEtVbg6LOClie1NkANd1pQxp MZqppuEauUxOQ+MCwjcExBYzDjBIhSaJ4a5B6Z7TXtGzAI6YdOIs4eDLWextTBJXjVm2 LWcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlE4xqZtmdPuSjv9WcIENFNZvAqDti2z/2dbuOrTZdn1oLpZ1UPc A7/yRbY2Rdq9SGyn85y6mU+Pmm7r
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdgMZBLUK7lLkyMqvWxyxp6gI1x1nAB8PNJhPBi6n2Uarvyovg1V+SiCsBRXiqAZw67dotnQA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:70c1:: with SMTP id l184-v6mr2577402qkc.86.1531413910367; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.37.142] ([2001:4878:a000:3000:1d92:69fa:2c62:7bf0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u10-v6sm19912250qki.6.2018.07.12.09.45.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, rfcplusplus@ietf.org, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, stpeter@mozilla.com
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:44:45 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.11.3r5509)
Message-ID: <A04F7168-1283-41B0-8F1B-CACD29F02E23@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <920ccbac-dbd2-7956-fb51-287f757bc157@cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBVC82qy0hbUbQKm=OsFPsaJUPndtVaxd782au6Qy0w6Q@mail.gmail.com> <a4b50286-5c54-e6cf-9087-7171030b7fca@juniper.net> <C9EBFF44-DB93-45E4-954D-2AC5E2F47D03@gmail.com> <20180710192810.GQ20282@mx4.yitter.info> <0e127473-902a-2421-6b5d-73f9e7f83286@juniper.net> <20180710204512.GT20282@mx4.yitter.info> <af1d2bc2-2027-0a4b-856a-35b35c386624@gmail.com> <3e8272be-50fb-113b-fd6f-a5850d668472@mozilla.com> <baa4f311ebe6f334ffd64b49f73a2231.squirrel@www.amsl.com> <aa7c626a-c34e-e38d-8762-ad53abac3630@mozilla.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20180711100739.0bc10fe0@elandnews.com> <0e28a2e9-d20d-5946-405a-e5c508ab590b@mozilla.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20180711152805.07d07338@elandnews.com> <35e8460f-7db7-98d7-7143-3aafff16b9fa@gmail.com> <CABkgnnXvjy2c7FkCDP58TkyXdtWKy_KmZwKCFLq+dJ1p3msWUA@mail.gmail.com> <618c78fa-c2c2-aa7d-f8e8-f0748609f438@joelhalpern.com> <CABkgnnWTBgVE6=9-0buZqvNbRTM-dC=Ty_GaHt4sdrCA-ypxJg@mail.gmail.com> <920ccbac-dbd2-7956-fb51-287f757bc157@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_4FD7C1E3-422C-4BCA-8C14-74C57A4528E9_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/FlOkBKvFq-Q4qSYcBuIoL3tumM0>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 16:45:14 -0000

On 12 Jul 2018, at 2:26, Eliot Lear wrote:

> At a cursory level that would argue for labeling not based on whether
> something has achieved rough consensus in the IETF, but rather based 
> on
> how well fielded an approach is.  That would require two things: a
> measure of adoption, something we have greatly struggled with in the
> past, and relabeling from time to time.

Elliot! This seems to me to be very interesting, useful, and difficult. 
(YMMV, of course)  MAPRG is touching on some aspects of this.

--aaron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email