Re: [secdir] Assignments

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> Wed, 10 March 2010 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jhutz@cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469DC3A6A2E for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:46:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6nqmVgRlG8TE for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp03.srv.cs.cmu.edu (SMTP03.SRV.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.217.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEFA3A697B for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MINBAR.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU (MINBAR.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.216.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp03.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o2ALkfxm005018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:46:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:32:54 -0500
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CAC52FA4A46A07B95DFCA2A1@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <22431_1267836161_o260gexf032659_alpine.BSF.2.00.1003051940330.69134@fledge.watson.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1003030827110.60319@fledge.watson.org> <22431_1267836161_o260gexf032659_alpine.BSF.2.00.1003051940330.69134@fledge.watson.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Scanned-By: mimedefang-cmuscs on 128.2.217.198
Subject: Re: [secdir] Assignments
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:46:41 -0000

--On Friday, March 05, 2010 07:42:37 PM -0500 Samuel Weiler 
<weiler+secdir@watson.org> wrote:

> Jeffrey Hutzelman      T 2010-03-09
> draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02

I didn't find anything particularly wrong with this document, but I had a 
hard time understanding whether it actually _did_ anything, rather than 
simply recommending some considerations for future work.  Maybe someone 
more familiar with autoconf and/or routing wants to take a look at this?

-- Jeff