IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Assignments

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Tue, 03 September 2013 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B580E21E8141 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 06:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.444
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.533, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5eMetQmAf2YN for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 06:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-x22d.google.com (mail-qe0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A97A21E8134 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 06:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 6so1471763qea.4 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 06:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=A6WqvZmUb8T1Vs95P5QiPJUn+nC1KAcUAAq0SB5afoY=; b=PmZ5posKVeUItKXQTLaqZXLFavORbedJryq59TxXXkfZwj5BFC8DyLniq7RMKl7AdT F0+4R5fVVqkaQt7PoEeqvkC+4IBIWv8RZMUQZk9sOXPJjJ3Tk8kOwCjdD+VLrhq4LDWj YX1pVL0GmzrWRhAoMtp7nur9J9jnxpMNga7IPw9qzKkr/yCG4dy1iw9+7yE8bILqE03I X6ghGCbf5byQDhoawEAVEDx+GwpHYeacmHGtPtAS9fEc8AD8vJlFTKc9SFqWHmQmHnQZ T4M4MPHUYMuF9Lo8hFWsu613DjjMs1gug6ygP4xCBNN9warl/7SH+y/PXgfy6gw0ngLY aCJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=A6WqvZmUb8T1Vs95P5QiPJUn+nC1KAcUAAq0SB5afoY=; b=OA5BWvtFgmx1IwLrOCr+85gEdQJJ2g4XsNjjt4HT20MPrWz5q3C/Arp3BcXsBwbWLG gsq1CzVioQC8LHaTq2EzNAMTgpav0Ar35Q8+FUoPYlWeKi7T5FhY43LVjcnWFtEBfiPK YqHh1SR3X5Oc1VgpTxSFTM0uIQH5nLOFozP6h+oNq/Vi6pxgIAP6SSXqu4XgUHEMVwRU v79UpVo2ikwU+degZii53kMJwwKoF1qiXEKnGhWJNU0PSDep3STyBU2eakKpUWXE0y2w JldZfQ/d7yvSYKhQY+Lx6+Rx+HAkpkTch8TveLD3+KlhGlaSLcnGYzW/A4VPEYrouu5j 6oFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm+IZ7jkLcCzpDS92MhU4+ME5SpmA/JtVHyJntiCL1n24dvQWvOh+7Vk0cfeAi+W+RStOEso2K6BYfrF+CnoeuXrk6aLPW43t6c2qkR3i5mq4ddBT47r3utx2eK46Jn5CbFXDSEdwbmP3Tpm49Mb6Gj8hV1phbvK2T2aMnoAJK0f88DWghhj+5CYXha5a4PnmN+ObEs
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.17.162 with SMTP id p2mr11505969qed.69.1378213461322; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 06:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.68.6 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 06:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20977.19493.623188.411131@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
References: <20977.19493.623188.411131@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:04:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrd9SR5eq_afSh5Z4e4CGgyQL6GKTcEwnG3DTpLWQWrf1WX_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: secdir-secretary@mit.edu
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bea38acc9922204e57a536f"
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Assignments
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:04:22 -0000

On 25 July 2013 17:02, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> wrote:

> Ben Laurie             T 2013-07-25 draft-ietf-emu-crypto-bind-04


I managed to miss this one, and I see it has now timed out, but perhaps
worth mentioning, even at this late date, that the existence of this I-D
seems to suggest that the protocols they're attempting to fix are badly
broken and should never have been standardised!

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status