Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 08 November 2012 05:04 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A49321F8A69 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:04:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eLLeBeSUOXhY for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:04:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C8D21F8A5D for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:04:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d4so1488269eek.31 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:04:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m3rnHgmwd9bcDwm/o6T0WASSW2BrLSuYR8lZE5AwNeM=; b=idzVtCAFCn+Nmlqx1czH0bMjFHrrZhU5AFQ9OZO01MpvmIifg4LGVepJg/F37XDxQW AgHGSnt6h9ib8YzQsVSBPB/RKxd2pSjFsP+F3lRtyZwxuIM98/7uicY8uHT+CHBLRQt3 1ZpiHgkosOs98SQJfwUcNFH/MTFwcbZANjcYVbI1ZUzz9e/pBKbG6T0duj0Qx4Udmezw ttP6sGqZ5JI3FeI3AAVQybHaeKaF9Sr6d+0SQZ3Oj9PiIJrwfTnerg0K2uCGs9K+AnQu +k1e6ZCj4xcGWDJv+iqG7f3CdpI3MitiZE9UJ/bTZRjCLvV1EfSvlQFVB+F9TU6ar/oI zIHw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.194.72 with SMTP id l48mr23712934een.9.1352351061246; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:04:21 -0800 (PST)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.177.71 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:04:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E9226C2E-3288-4A87-A476-4925BF9ADA22@apnic.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F6733D@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CC63F9EE.C1A7%andy@arin.net> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F68471@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CAL9jLaa2GvTQwRW6Y4Un6EHZzBgHJKoGoGe=EybRZfGncFVP2g@mail.gmail.com> <E9226C2E-3288-4A87-A476-4925BF9ADA22@apnic.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:04:21 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tRnJs4ilXdgh4x3obMFloUQ7tUM
Message-ID: <CAL9jLab6oDmGLsFmt+9AGSA8eC=Q+eJ_HXTr+WVj_1rAcCOkrA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:04:23 -0000

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> When did the WG reach consensus on adopting this draft?

when it spent ~50 mesasages discussing it?
it seems that, even if we abandon it in the end, discussing this over
a draft is a good thing to do.

> Thanks,
>   Byron
>
> On 13/10/2012, at 12:53 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Helo,
>> Since we've been through this for a while (originally) and this has
>> been quiet for ~1 month... let's call this done and move to the next
>> step.
>>
>> 1) there was lots of discussion on the topic at hand
>> 2) lots of that discussion was not about acceptance/rejection of the
>> idea into the WG
>> 3) lots of people contributed
>>
>> I do think we should continue to have this discussion more officially
>> around a draft, the wg discussion leads me to believe this is the
>> right course... can the authors spin a newly named version and we can
>> start discussing the topic / changes?
>>
>> I think if, in the end, the wg decides to abandon the work that's also
>> fine, but we should have a more structured chat about the topic, that
>> happens around a draft.
>>
>> -chris
>> co-chair
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Murphy, Sandra
>> <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> wrote:
>>> Speaking as wg co-chair
>>>
>>> Of course revision and new request for acceptance is possible.
>>>
>>> Even arguing some more leading to acceptance of draft as is is a possibility.
>>>
>>> Some commentors specifically requested that the discussion be added to some existing draft.
>>>
>>> Trying to judge wg desire of a way to proceed.
>>>
>>>
>>> --Sandy
>>>
>>>
>>> From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Andy Newton [andy@arin.net]
>>>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:56 PM
>>>
>>> To: Murphy, Sandra; Alexey Melnikov; sidr@ietf.org
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Are the chairs not allowing the draft authors to address the issues and try again?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: <Murphy>, Sandra <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
>>>
>>> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:10 PM
>>>
>>> To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "sidr@ietf.org"
>>> <sidr@ietf.org>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <!--
>>> p
>>>        {margin-top:0;
>>>        margin-bottom:0}
>>> -->
>>> BODY {direction: ltr;font-family: Arial;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;}P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}
>>>
>>> Speaking as wg co-chair:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Certainly a very lively acceptance call!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The chairs do not see that there was consensus that the wg should adopt this draft.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But there was ample evidence that the wg was interested in the issue - by the wg spending lots of time discussing the issue.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So that leaves the chairs with an ambivalent message.  The wg is very interested in the topic but not in adopting a draft that would record any decisions about the topic.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What would the wg like to do now?  Particularly those who disagreed with the content of the draft - if you would dislike the recommendations, are you OK with no recommendations instead?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From:
>>>
>>> sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Alexey Melnikov [alexey.melnikov@isode.com]
>>>
>>> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:12 PM
>>>
>>> To:
>>> sidr@ietf.org
>>>
>>> Subject: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On behalf of SIDR WG chairs I would like to initiate 2 weeks acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting starting from today, August 4th. Please
>>> send your positive or negative feedback to the mailing list or directly to chairs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Alexey
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sidr mailing list
>>> sidr@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>