Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

"Carlos M. martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com> Wed, 29 August 2012 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9D811E80E2 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RB-VfCKXtmdX for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C65E11E80E0 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yenm5 with SMTP id m5so166227yen.31 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UqevLY11XnI838zUuypUcTk17cjsAnixnNTJBT/VOU8=; b=GvbCT1kCrJHj1If4ksHwEkoGL6/ghdGRzRFDZfFWw5+pM94ZtXQx9NetYkG3uoeJ4e +rv4J9LcnyBep5kjrHeHGtAMlWFTNtMzMAfwPgqFpjFHWckt/6MmZJPZZN5KBebEd6Nx d7BYCBDhRvVfYfJ9iMpTre9b/8AzKNUp5J1d6bWmMbf/oCSskor6BqhdJhaIDA5hKzp3 Zd9GhACZu40Jvg1nYkTeFfj/FNtCjEGz1f3F/WPU9vQA1uS5kQSM81jK+NUMoGXJQWVC 2Du3IaRHZjYj69YX/rprkdW9oI1hl6EPvvNDj1IE9XHXFhy/XQ99Fzciszaay/3aIRxY 1u2Q==
Received: by 10.236.77.39 with SMTP id c27mr2339959yhe.99.1346262426055; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from europa.local ([2001:13c7:7001:2128:51d0:c9db:5398:b9ee]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z5sm23131161ang.7.2012.08.29.10.47.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <503E5595.3040306@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:47:01 -0300
From: "Carlos M. martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
References: <FE3A7AFD-0064-477A-B8F0-55735610CC9A@isode.com> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F6733D@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F6733D@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:47:07 -0000

<personal opinion>

IMO the idea is worth considering, but only iif some implementable
mechanism can be devised that:

1- guarantees following the registries (this would require grandparents
somehow being able to check children's registries)

2- makes the fact that a given object has been produced on behalf of a
grandchild explicit

At some point I started thinking about some form of 'lightweight
up/down' for lack of a better name, something that submits requests
upwards but doesn't require operating a CA, but I'm not sure if it's
worth the effort and probably parents won't deploy it anyways.

</personal opinion>

~CArlos

On 8/29/12 1:10 PM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:
> Speaking as wg co-chair:
> 
> Certainly a very lively acceptance call!
> 
> The chairs do not see that there was consensus that the wg should adopt
> this draft.
> 
> But there was ample evidence that the wg was interested in the issue -
> by the wg spending lots of time discussing the issue.
> 
> So that leaves the chairs with an ambivalent message.  The wg is very
> interested in the topic but not in adopting a draft that would record
> any decisions about the topic.
> 
> What would the wg like to do now?  Particularly those who disagreed with
> the content of the draft - if you would dislike the recommendations, are
> you OK with no recommendations instead?
> 
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of
> Alexey Melnikov [alexey.melnikov@isode.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:12 PM
> *To:* sidr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
> 
> Hi,
> On behalf of SIDR WG chairs I would like to initiate 2 weeks acceptance
> call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting starting from today, August 4th.
> Please send your positive or negative feedback to the mailing list or
> directly to chairs.
> 
> Thank you,
> Alexey
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>