Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

Eric Osterweil <eosterweil@verisign.com> Thu, 23 August 2012 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <eosterweil@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AB521F8582 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lof1RU5IdNYr for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og108.obsmtp.com (exprod6og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE0721F8534 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob108.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUDY9zupmRvqL/Z3IrEhX4GuSf7mCAABg@postini.com; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:27:37 PDT
Received: from dul1wnexcn01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (dul1wnexcn01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.170.12.138]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q7NERLfp003432; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:27:21 -0400
Received: from dul1eosterwe-m1.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.88.29.242]) by dul1wnexcn01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:27:21 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Eric Osterweil <eosterweil@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F55562@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:27:21 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <761BD3D3-2906-45B8-A13D-942AD3C51F34@verisign.com>
References: <FE3A7AFD-0064-477A-B8F0-55735610CC9A@isode.com> <53D504DF-C0A3-4CFC-AD93-689630336F7D@apnic.net> <097D025D-1879-455C-BB14-F9C8BFAC88AA@ripe.net> <m2y5lo86hj.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAL9jLaYanPMasuNk1gFHXpXCMWDE1vVkL5B_z88KSNRj5Mq6tQ@mail.gmail.com>, <50250C7F.8060603@gmail.com> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F55562@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
To: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Aug 2012 14:27:21.0402 (UTC) FILETIME=[682681A0:01CD813B]
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:27:38 -0000

On Aug 10, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:

> speaking as co-chair
> 
> A reminder to the group that the question is whether to adopt this draft as a working group work item.  The content of the draft is not the discussion point here, the acceptance for the group to work on it.
> 
> Whether you like the content or not, you should say whether you think the wg should adopt this draft.
> 
> --Sandy, speaking as co-chair

I do not think this should be adopted as a wg item.  I think the topic of this draft fits better as supporting text in another existing draft (we have a plethora of those to choose from), but the contributions / opinions in this draft do not (imho) stand firmly enough on their own to be an atomic draft.

Eric