IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Mon, 15 October 2012 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@arin.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EA521F877C for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 06:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6gWU0Qp14oH1 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 06:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.arin.net (smtp2.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67B821F8779 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 06:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id 3E654213640; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:21:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH06.corp.arin.net (chaxch06.corp.arin.net [192.149.252.95]) by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D6A213645; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:21:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH03.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.18) by CHAXCH06.corp.arin.net (192.149.252.95) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.3; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:20:59 -0400
Received: from CHAXCH02.corp.arin.net ([169.254.2.245]) by CHAXCH03.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.17]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:21:33 -0400
From: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
Thread-Index: AQHNcmy8FCcE8Dzhaka0MZcJTJP7npdxX+YAgAAMpICAAEYPAIBEvmMAgARaKAA=
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:21:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CCA17E50.DC47%andy@arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaa2GvTQwRW6Y4Un6EHZzBgHJKoGoGe=EybRZfGncFVP2g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
x-originating-ip: [192.149.252.97]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9EFFCA150F6FC24FBEF88D977EA68B6D@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:21:38 -0000

On 10/12/12 10:53 AM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

>I think if, in the end, the wg decides to abandon the work that's also
>fine, but we should have a more structured chat about the topic, that
>happens around a draft.


As the person who specifically asked of the chairs that the draft authors
be allowed to address the issues raised, I'd like specifics on this more
structured chat. I ask because it is not apparent that the normal means of
IETF discussion were attempted. Of the 38 messages regarding the draft
directly, the draft author only responded 3 times, nor did the author
engage in any of the side discussions. And the draft submitted as a
working group document addresses NONE of the issues raised (it is just a
re-spin with the dates and file name changed). If normal IETF discourse is
being set aside especially when it was not fully engaged, we should also
be given the exception criteria under which this scenario qualifies when
others do not.

-andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email