Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

"Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> Wed, 29 August 2012 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB62E21F85F4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JNfiLPc+4lq4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A153621F8605 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7TL63CG007428; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:06:03 -0500
Received: from Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([157.185.80.107]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7TL63MZ012852; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:06:03 -0500
Received: from HERMES.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([fe80::e4a8:a383:2128:c0e5]) by Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([fe80::e4a8:a383:2128:c0e5%21]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:06:47 -0400
From: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
To: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
Thread-Index: AQHNcmzBDgLmICzaeEOZLRGrqn0RiJdxGn+dgACVHQD//74d0w==
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:06:46 +0000
Message-ID: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F68471@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F6733D@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>, <CC63F9EE.C1A7%andy@arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <CC63F9EE.C1A7%andy@arin.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.185.63.118]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:06:05 -0000

Speaking as wg co-chair

Of course revision and new request for acceptance is possible.

Even arguing some more leading to acceptance of draft as is is a possibility.

Some commentors specifically requested that the discussion be added to some existing draft.

Trying to judge wg desire of a way to proceed.


--Sandy


From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Andy Newton [andy@arin.net]

Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:56 PM

To: Murphy, Sandra; Alexey Melnikov; sidr@ietf.org

Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting






Are the chairs not allowing the draft authors to address the issues and try again?



-andy





From: <Murphy>, Sandra <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>

Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:10 PM

To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "sidr@ietf.org"
 <sidr@ietf.org>

Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting






<!--
p
	{margin-top:0;
	margin-bottom:0}
-->
BODY {direction: ltr;font-family: Arial;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;}P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}

Speaking as wg co-chair:



Certainly a very lively acceptance call!



The chairs do not see that there was consensus that the wg should adopt this draft.



But there was ample evidence that the wg was interested in the issue - by the wg spending lots of time discussing the issue.



So that leaves the chairs with an ambivalent message.  The wg is very interested in the topic but not in adopting a draft that would record any decisions about the topic.



What would the wg like to do now?  Particularly those who disagreed with the content of the draft - if you would dislike the recommendations, are you OK with no recommendations instead?



--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair





From:

sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Alexey Melnikov [alexey.melnikov@isode.com]

Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:12 PM

To: 
sidr@ietf.org

Subject: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting





Hi,

On behalf of SIDR WG chairs I would like to initiate 2 weeks acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting starting from today, August 4th. Please
 send your positive or negative feedback to the mailing list or directly to chairs.




Thank you,
Alexey