IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net> Thu, 08 November 2012 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bje@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285E421F86E4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:53:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ofbIGgS-Cmur for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:53:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (asmtp.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:11::199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3302D21F8699 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:53:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:dc0:a000:4:bc82:a6d0:f9fe:b22e] (unknown [IPv6:2001:dc0:a000:4:bc82:a6d0:f9fe:b22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asmtp.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286B3B68DF; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 15:53:28 +1000 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CA7A8D64-C4E9-41C7-9F81-10F714339031"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLab6oDmGLsFmt+9AGSA8eC=Q+eJ_HXTr+WVj_1rAcCOkrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:53:27 +1000
Message-Id: <E7882632-509C-45A4-AA4F-EA681B4A2541@apnic.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F6733D@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CC63F9EE.C1A7%andy@arin.net> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F68471@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CAL9jLaa2GvTQwRW6Y4Un6EHZzBgHJKoGoGe=EybRZfGncFVP2g@mail.gmail.com> <E9226C2E-3288-4A87-A476-4925BF9ADA22@apnic.net> <CAL9jLab6oDmGLsFmt+9AGSA8eC=Q+eJ_HXTr+WVj_1rAcCOkrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:53:32 -0000

Hi Chris,

On 08/11/2012, at 3:04 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net> wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>> 
>> When did the WG reach consensus on adopting this draft?
> 
> when it spent ~50 mesasages discussing it?
> it seems that, even if we abandon it in the end, discussing this over
> a draft is a good thing to do.

When that discussion happened, the chairs declared a lack of consensus for adoption: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg05015.html

Have the chairs reconsidered that declaration of lack of WG consensus, or adopted the draft despite a lack of WG consensus?

Perhaps there's a problem to be addressed, and if a discussion should happen around that problem, a document describing the problem might be a more useful way forward.

  Byron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email