Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

	My recommendation would be to follow the registry.

	If the parent disappears then the grandparent should re-allocate the resource to the grandchildren (which then will become a new child).

	IMHO is the only way to guarantee some RPKI <-> allocation consistency.

Regards,
as

Disclaimer: I work for a grandparent but this is my personal view.

On 29 Aug 2012, at 12:10, Murphy, Sandra wrote:

> Speaking as wg co-chair:
> 
> Certainly a very lively acceptance call!
> 
> The chairs do not see that there was consensus that the wg should adopt this draft.
> 
> But there was ample evidence that the wg was interested in the issue - by the wg spending lots of time discussing the issue.
> 
> So that leaves the chairs with an ambivalent message.  The wg is very interested in the topic but not in adopting a draft that would record any decisions about the topic.
> 
> What would the wg like to do now?  Particularly those who disagreed with the content of the draft - if you would dislike the recommendations, are you OK with no recommendations instead?
> 
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> 
> From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Alexey Melnikov [alexey.melnikov@isode.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:12 PM
> To: sidr@ietf.org
> Subject: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
> 
> Hi,
> On behalf of SIDR WG chairs I would like to initiate 2 weeks acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting starting from today, August 4th. Please send your positive or negative feedback to the mailing list or directly to chairs.
> 
> Thank you,
> Alexey
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr