IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 08 November 2012 06:41 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9226B21F8893 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:41:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hOPV4nySgn+F for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:41:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCDF21F889D for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:41:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d4so1523441eek.31 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:41:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=E7fLigC620kdnhdv+TTYfELBwzQ6cq9Z3Y97yQr2XtA=; b=yk7SAMOCkkmcWo5EY0GACPj4pTcEcl+t8sdFxKRAv5gxfaD+Fj5D6omwqYCik0xvCF Zx5pgM9CT2mnjHbBWCsGurQA79vujrL33nKAE2xlGGByBGWhux7eVC8LxFCPTJxSX7JA 8vW+f1XGGXdtXiNAvEIdDRf/Y4XJicNGMLza0txcQeoFX2O/5LAt+5cUasmzX/XrSLLP pFf4UCZ3sSVgyZ/oQ5tzwVhEVA2GsHd87g+r1tM5Urt8uvUBjZql1e4XsHdBB3xCEK4R A5EX6ReeuT9j4b7JyWloI+1RwsDf3YB5HBBX3K6nQwu/16P1lR+FkfTGPyZyUbGUmerY Y4Bg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.184.1 with SMTP id r1mr24472112eem.4.1352356913672; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:41:53 -0800 (PST)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.177.71 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:41:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <111B9A0A-2999-4A2C-B6FC-34F591ECCC54@apnic.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F6733D@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CC63F9EE.C1A7%andy@arin.net> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F68471@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CAL9jLaa2GvTQwRW6Y4Un6EHZzBgHJKoGoGe=EybRZfGncFVP2g@mail.gmail.com> <E9226C2E-3288-4A87-A476-4925BF9ADA22@apnic.net> <CAL9jLab6oDmGLsFmt+9AGSA8eC=Q+eJ_HXTr+WVj_1rAcCOkrA@mail.gmail.com> <E7882632-509C-45A4-AA4F-EA681B4A2541@apnic.net> <CAL9jLaYFZQyds5GW81Ja=Ctodmz_rwD6RNe-+Ztto4uOwXwHcg@mail.gmail.com> <111B9A0A-2999-4A2C-B6FC-34F591ECCC54@apnic.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 01:41:53 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: l5pOjkvkbD5PIUftiH0khnjFNps
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaYtHmFhLC0SDsbs4ZFvk9K+oJcFjxTD=Tges7q_sKFkpg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org wg" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:41:55 -0000

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 08/11/2012, at 4:00 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ok, i suppose my point here is that there's a bunch of discussion,
>> there's a draft that got chattered about quite a bit. having the wg
>> talk about it a bit more formally (which could just wither away to
>> nothing in the end) doesn't seem to hurt.
>
> I think I understand this somewhat better now, thanks.  There's a wealth of discussion that happened previously, I don't think there's a lot of value in re-iterating those comments now, since they're all still there in the archive - or do you think it would be constructive to list some of those discussion points again?
>

i hope that after the current hub-bub dies down (meeting hub-bub) we
can get back to this document, wrangle the comments into feedback the
authors can use and see where the discussion goes from there.

-chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email