IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Sat, 10 November 2012 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC3921F8482 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:14:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gLAhB7AyWbgg for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:14:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A7C21F8481 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:14:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id C379234124; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:14:49 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:14:49 -0500
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20121110221449.GI78300@verdi>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F6733D@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CC63F9EE.C1A7%andy@arin.net> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F68471@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CAL9jLaa2GvTQwRW6Y4Un6EHZzBgHJKoGoGe=EybRZfGncFVP2g@mail.gmail.com> <E9226C2E-3288-4A87-A476-4925BF9ADA22@apnic.net> <CAL9jLab6oDmGLsFmt+9AGSA8eC=Q+eJ_HXTr+WVj_1rAcCOkrA@mail.gmail.com> <E7882632-509C-45A4-AA4F-EA681B4A2541@apnic.net> <509D2C04.4020704@isode.com> <CAH1iCir2hfH2nvZdyfyzYZnuQkAUeo8jCP89gfphvtfkwg-2yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCir2hfH2nvZdyfyzYZnuQkAUeo8jCP89gfphvtfkwg-2yQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:14:50 -0000

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>...
 Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:42:15 -0500
> 
> If a draft is accepted in its current state, then any promises by the
> authors to make changes are much like promises by politicians during
> election campaigns - not worth the paper they are written on.

   While technically true:

1) if the WGCs let this happen, it's an abuse of power. At adoption as a
   WG draft, authors "relinquish change control" and different persons
   must be appointed document editors if authors aren't OK with that.

2) nothing goes to IESG without consensus at WG LastCall.

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email