IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net> Thu, 08 November 2012 06:26 UTC

Return-Path: <bje@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E138421F8792 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:26:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FVaGwi63Py43 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (asmtp.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:11::199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376BB21F8742 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:26:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:dc0:a000:4:bc82:a6d0:f9fe:b22e] (unknown [IPv6:2001:dc0:a000:4:bc82:a6d0:f9fe:b22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asmtp.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E70B68DF; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 16:26:39 +1000 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6ADBC48F-581F-491C-978E-11D3309F6CAC"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaYFZQyds5GW81Ja=Ctodmz_rwD6RNe-+Ztto4uOwXwHcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:26:38 +1000
Message-Id: <111B9A0A-2999-4A2C-B6FC-34F591ECCC54@apnic.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F6733D@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CC63F9EE.C1A7%andy@arin.net> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F68471@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CAL9jLaa2GvTQwRW6Y4Un6EHZzBgHJKoGoGe=EybRZfGncFVP2g@mail.gmail.com> <E9226C2E-3288-4A87-A476-4925BF9ADA22@apnic.net> <CAL9jLab6oDmGLsFmt+9AGSA8eC=Q+eJ_HXTr+WVj_1rAcCOkrA@mail.gmail.com> <E7882632-509C-45A4-AA4F-EA681B4A2541@apnic.net> <CAL9jLaYFZQyds5GW81Ja=Ctodmz_rwD6RNe-+Ztto4uOwXwHcg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org wg" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:26:44 -0000

Hi Chris,

On 08/11/2012, at 4:00 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> ok, i suppose my point here is that there's a bunch of discussion,
> there's a draft that got chattered about quite a bit. having the wg
> talk about it a bit more formally (which could just wither away to
> nothing in the end) doesn't seem to hurt.

I think I understand this somewhat better now, thanks.  There's a wealth of discussion that happened previously, I don't think there's a lot of value in re-iterating those comments now, since they're all still there in the archive - or do you think it would be constructive to list some of those discussion points again?

  Byron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email