IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting

Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net> Mon, 06 August 2012 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bje@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A1921F84A5 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 18:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJoUeLU8rTBy for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 18:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (asmtp.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:11::199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD97B21F84FD for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 18:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:dc0:a000:4:1997:f74d:aac1:1b0] (unknown [IPv6:2001:dc0:a000:4:1997:f74d:aac1:1b0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asmtp.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9819B67EA; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:25:16 +1000 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_60B527D8-1555-4B42-9D40-27FC950C616F"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <FE3A7AFD-0064-477A-B8F0-55735610CC9A@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:25:16 +1000
Message-Id: <DB39B70A-A558-4D37-8AF1-50898CBE9ACF@apnic.net>
References: <FE3A7AFD-0064-477A-B8F0-55735610CC9A@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 01:25:22 -0000

Hi Alexey and list,

I oppose this acceptance call.  The draft makes no reference to the conflict with the CP draft (6484) [1] with respect to the requirement that certificates issued by a CA conform to the record of current holdings.  If a grandchild is not listed in the record of current holdings, a 6484 compliant CA must not issue certificates in their name; if the grandchild is listed the record of current holdings, then they are no longer a grandchild, and there is no need for a grandparenting process.

  Byron

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6484 sections 1.1, 1.4, and 4.2.2.

On 05/08/2012, at 4:12 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> Hi,
> On behalf of SIDR WG chairs I would like to initiate 2 weeks acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting starting from today, August 4th. Please send your positive or negative feedback to the mailing list or directly to chairs.
> 
> Thank you,
> Alexey
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email