Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Thu, 19 August 2021 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0125E3A0CA5 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_AFFORDABLE=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hDPEWTq1lewF for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 427C43A0CA8 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml745-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Gqmz11vrtz6DB38 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 09:15:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.100) by fraeml745-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.226) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 03:16:09 +0200
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 09:16:07 +0800
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 09:16:07 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
Thread-Index: AQHXiWH3Uml8fTd+8ESRVx0BxZEvdqt3s8CAgAJm+ZA=
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:16:06 +0000
Message-ID: <e95528730057454d8cae2ae86be674a5@huawei.com>
References: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com> <MN2PR13MB42068A755C73048052C40CAFD2FE9@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB42068A755C73048052C40CAFD2FE9@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.143]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Nv645hNfNWzkBv7pQ_oNno-ydE0>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:16:19 -0000

Dear chairs, 

I believe the WG should standardize a single data plane solution. 

I fully agree with Dhruv that the cost of multiple data plane for SRv6 compression would be unaffordable and the interoperable deployment would suffer from it. 

Best regards,
Jie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 4:28 AM
> To: Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>om>; spring@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
> 
> Dear WG:
> 
> If you have not already done so please do provide your comments to the
> mailing list as soon as possible.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Jim, Joel & Bruno
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 2:52 PM
> To: spring@ietf.org
> Subject: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
> 
> The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on
> the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the working
> group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate
> email a bit later.
> 
> Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the
> perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
> discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
> everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
> re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
> discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their opinion
> is and an explanation of why.
> 
> The question we are asking you to comment on is:
> 
> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?
> 
> Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of business
> PDT on 20-August-2021.
> 
> Thank you,
> Joel, Jim, and Bruno
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
> w.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjames.
> n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C250776c6aff74c568c8a08d957790ab9%7C
> 0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637636999654946952
> %7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL
> CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=JyUjJng7gmClXGUs
> Ll9AV6YWYWLQUFpmTPud8%2F0LRWE%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring