Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

Dear chairs, 

I believe the WG should standardize a single data plane solution. 

I fully agree with Dhruv that the cost of multiple data plane for SRv6 compression would be unaffordable and the interoperable deployment would suffer from it. 

Best regards,
Jie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 4:28 AM
> To: Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>; spring@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
> 
> Dear WG:
> 
> If you have not already done so please do provide your comments to the
> mailing list as soon as possible.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Jim, Joel & Bruno
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 2:52 PM
> To: spring@ietf.org
> Subject: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
> 
> The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on
> the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the working
> group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate
> email a bit later.
> 
> Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the
> perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
> discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
> everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
> re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
> discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their opinion
> is and an explanation of why.
> 
> The question we are asking you to comment on is:
> 
> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?
> 
> Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of business
> PDT on 20-August-2021.
> 
> Thank you,
> Joel, Jim, and Bruno
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
> w.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjames.
> n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C250776c6aff74c568c8a08d957790ab9%7C
> 0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637636999654946952
> %7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL
> CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=JyUjJng7gmClXGUs
> Ll9AV6YWYWLQUFpmTPud8%2F0LRWE%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring