IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

"Voyer, Daniel" <daniel.voyer@bell.ca> Fri, 20 August 2021 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=85902e97d=daniel.voyer@bell.ca>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020493A10C5 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bell.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z-jsGigyYAU5 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ESA2-Wyn.bell.ca (esa2-wyn.bell.ca [67.69.243.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EADB3A10B8 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bell.ca; i=@bell.ca; q=dns/txt; s=ESAcorp; t=1629492397; x=1661028397; h=from:to:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=RHQUlkQTQGOIKg0NbXubJmUdCOakMUcaQUGG66bLdp0=; b=P0H2Ddt6qb1LhsKe88Vm7K2wsBNmJ8icBfsRVMjjptPnIaCaZ7k4qiWK YamqiQM+15z5ni9/YGb4mfXCfAxIqYtQMaIaPujdNy9kOuxXcPOOCOoSA OlOWxPQIK88seX87D13WZQ8tck3tVwS88O2ibgr5f3ERs99aaCRL0NNQP 5096P+OZBJ4Md99bElmO3O8e2yfXRdhuVgrID6qgsnZyRfwAV54oTDsAP Vv4qt2DRO+c8hTe0Efgs5Esklu5GggijoxOBbfrRnqlJxpy4MVA6/nwE2 hKuj69G9+sNaQHWIQSIdSoVA6gpmQqt/yjhkYqKR4IUzePzjcm0xmNdTD w==;
IronPort-SDR: 21G5Kta8UxT4eq/Ve9DxjgBDU26tRP3gifJPulOeZVtTAbnsqjLwtzK5WvcEo+40x0oniRfA2V gwmVD3/HprpA==
Received: from dm5czo-d00.bellca.int.bell.ca (HELO DG1MBX03-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca) ([198.235.102.32]) by esa02corp-wyn.bell.corp.bce.ca with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2021 16:46:35 -0400
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8eb6:120e::8eb6:120e) by DG1MBX03-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8eb6:120d::8eb6:120d) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 16:46:35 -0400
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::b0c3:78d9:a8f:2958]) by DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::b0c3:78d9:a8f:2958%22]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.018; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 16:46:35 -0400
From: "Voyer, Daniel" <daniel.voyer@bell.ca>
To: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>, James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXT]Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
Thread-Index: AQHXlgR20ppPKHuaM0OQtPrMeTxixg==
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 20:46:35 +0000
Message-ID: <D8263B23-9AD6-4B7D-811C-5710FFAD83FA@bell.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.52.21080801
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.24.112.66]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <799CE634514BBF4E96A42E5C676853D5@exchange.bell.ca>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/UbbC3ajs5HmOvJMTXYxxukEe6Vw>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 20:46:43 -0000

Hi, 

I also support a single standard for SRv6 compression. 

Thanks
dan

On 2021-08-20, 3:25 PM, "spring on behalf of Haoyu Song" <spring-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of haoyu.song@futurewei.com> wrote:

    SPRING WG,

    I support a single standard for SR compression from the perspective of system design (both hardware and software). I have reviewed the solution drafts and believe CSID should be standardized. Thanks!

    Haoyu

    -----Original Message-----
    From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of James Guichard
    Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 1:28 PM
    To: Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>; spring@ietf.org
    Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

    Dear WG:

    If you have not already done so please do provide your comments to the mailing list as soon as possible. 

    Thanks!

    Jim, Joel & Bruno

    -----Original Message-----
    From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
    Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 2:52 PM
    To: spring@ietf.org
    Subject: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

    The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate email a bit later.

    Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their opinion is and an explanation of why.

    The question we are asking you to comment on is:

    Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing SRv6 information?

    Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of business PDT on 20-August-2021.

    Thank you,
    Joel, Jim, and Bruno

    _______________________________________________
    spring mailing list
    spring@ietf.org
    https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&amp;data=04%7C01%7Chaoyu.song%40futurewei.com%7C98b0f48e10f241cd561b08d961bd7fab%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637648288814730023%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=hnXF7kduzyJlyyBUw8sntnkAU6XWem62n1T9L2F5MgI%3D&amp;reserved=0

    _______________________________________________
    spring mailing list
    spring@ietf.org
    https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&amp;data=04%7C01%7Chaoyu.song%40futurewei.com%7C98b0f48e10f241cd561b08d961bd7fab%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637648288814730023%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=hnXF7kduzyJlyyBUw8sntnkAU6XWem62n1T9L2F5MgI%3D&amp;reserved=0

    _______________________________________________
    spring mailing list
    spring@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    External Email: Please use caution when opening links and attachments / Courriel externe: Soyez prudent avec les liens et documents joints

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email