Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com Wed, 18 August 2021 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77573A1ADF for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BN0EwAVNGE-A for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxus.zteusa.com (mxus.zteusa.com [4.14.134.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46F73A1ACD for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-us.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.36.11.29]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id BCE36982882FCF329567; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 03:56:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mgapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.36.9.142]) by mse-us.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 17IJu7Ho018745; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 03:56:07 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com)
Received: from mapi (mgapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid81; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 03:56:07 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 03:56:07 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af9611d65d775605058
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202108190356076354409@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB42068A755C73048052C40CAFD2FE9@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: 4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com, MN2PR13MB42068A755C73048052C40CAFD2FE9@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com
To: james.n.guichard@futurewei.com
Cc: jmh@joelhalpern.com, spring@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-us.zte.com.cn 17IJu7Ho018745
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/sQO7Ab4eQMC_lOZ-sj1Y_vLgx3A>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 19:56:19 -0000

Dear All,

I strongly support the standardization of a single data plane solution that supports Segment Routing using also compressed SIDs in an IPv6 network.








Regards,


Greg Mirsky






Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division









E: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com 
www.zte.com.cn






Original Mail



Sender: JamesGuichard
To: Joel M. Halpern;spring@ietf.org;
Date: 2021/08/17 13:28
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression


Dear WG:
 
If you have not already done so please do provide your comments to the mailing list as soon as possible.  
 
Thanks!
 
Jim, Joel & Bruno
 
-----Original Message-----
From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 2:52 PM
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
 
The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate email a bit later.
 
Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their opinion is and an explanation of why.
 
The question we are asking you to comment on is:
 
Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing SRv6 information?
 
Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of business PDT on 20-August-2021.
 
Thank you,
Joel, Jim, and Bruno
 
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C250776c6aff74c568c8a08d957790ab9%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637636999654946952%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=JyUjJng7gmClXGUsLl9AV6YWYWLQUFpmTPud8%2F0LRWE%3D&amp;reserved=0
 
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring