[spring] 答复: Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

Lihao <lihao@h3c.com> Wed, 04 August 2021 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <lihao@h3c.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFB13A10BD for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 16:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JhteLt3jQVx3 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 16:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com (smtp.h3c.com [60.191.123.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78C0D3A10B8 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 16:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DAG2EX03-BASE.srv.huawei-3com.com ([10.8.0.66]) by h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com with ESMTP id 174N25sq072099; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:02:05 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from lihao@h3c.com)
Received: from DAG2EX05-BASE.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.8.0.68) by DAG2EX03-BASE.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.8.0.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.12; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:02:05 +0800
Received: from DAG2EX05-BASE.srv.huawei-3com.com ([fe80::f963:2fad:283e:6b1c]) by DAG2EX05-BASE.srv.huawei-3com.com ([fe80::f963:2fad:283e:6b1c%2]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.012; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:02:05 +0800
From: Lihao <lihao@h3c.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
Thread-Index: AQHXiWHwHiF51Iovz0WEc2RznRREDKtj9iPg
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 23:02:04 +0000
Message-ID: <4a9745892748443e96d614a6fc8c8220@h3c.com>
References: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.76.44]
x-sender-location: DAG2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-DNSRBL:
X-MAIL: h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com 174N25sq072099
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/ZygATo6RwMhpLaBafRm2WehluPA>
Subject: [spring] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFByb2dyZXNzaW5nIFN0YW5kYXJkaXppbmcg?= =?gb2312?b?U1Igb3ZlciBJUHY2IGNvbXByZXNzaW9u?=
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 23:02:23 -0000

>Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing SRv6 information?

Yes. more than one solution is awful for vendor/operator/provider...


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Joel M. Halpern
发送时间: 2021年8月5日 2:52
收件人: spring@ietf.org
主题: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate email a bit later.

Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their opinion is and an explanation of why.

The question we are asking you to comment on is:

Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing SRv6 information?

Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of business PDT on 20-August-2021.

Thank you,
Joel, Jim, and Bruno

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
本邮件及其附件含有新华三集团的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出
的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、
或散发)本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本
邮件!
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from New H3C, which is
intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the
information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
by phone or email immediately and delete it!