Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 19 August 2021 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A47A3A074B for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 03:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmrwKA0v5EGs for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 03:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 640BC3A0765 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 03:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c83-250-146-169.bredband.tele2.se [83.250.146.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD4223495A6; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:04:25 +0200 (CEST)
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
References: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com> <DBAPR07MB6984444B7B0099E1E9C8CE88EBFF9@DBAPR07MB6984.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <212a9ced-30c9-e5c4-d2b6-1cd59667d475@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:04:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DBAPR07MB6984444B7B0099E1E9C8CE88EBFF9@DBAPR07MB6984.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/YLYf7WKw1HY4lZH31g57fLaHupg>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:04:39 -0000

Dhairs, working group,

I agree with Matthew, we should standardize one single data plane 
behavior for IPv6 compression.


/Loa
 > compressing SRv6 information

On 18/08/2021 19:35, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) wrote:
> Joel
> 
> Yes, I believe the WG should standardize a single data plane solution.
> 
> This will enable to the WG and industry to move forward and enable 
> vendors to implement a single interoperable solution. It reduces overall 
> solution complexity and greatly benefits deployments.
> 
> Based on the experience of multiple working groups, it is hugely 
> beneficial to have a single data plane solution on which we can focus 
> our efforts.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Matthew
> 
> *From: *spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Joel M. Halpern 
> <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 19:52
> *To: *spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
> 
> The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts
> on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the
> working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic
> for a separate email a bit later.
> 
> Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and
> the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
> discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
> everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
> re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
> discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their
> opinion is and an explanation of why.
> 
> The question we are asking you to comment on is:
> 
> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?
> 
> Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of
> business PDT on 20-August-2021.
> 
> Thank you,
> Joel, Jim, and Bruno
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64