Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

Shunsuke Homma <> Mon, 16 August 2021 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69183A121D for <>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EdbEIYLILb9K for <>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E903A121B for <>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id y34so35816078lfa.8 for <>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i9meeabV8uJYazL6yMMZ7QuBcTFePXNdQX+fH3gCExc=; b=NdEF3n0lRnqixPPpLmvOHPj+zuGoO2+Z2yRv/rN4iR3sTXK6AMaJqOX5VHKERIzuj/ yGWy3gR1mMYq7hxSVRihRbKcE64yOrAdh8p06Z43vowYJ2q5ocrszQfmVCLdjnJAFr6Y 1Wo8uYu2nPxDJytzwnhsCItU/ozggCE/nq/6AbW2EaCJ0widwU0xhkUthy0co1BTqu7L 9QbXbDW5hNpcX+QEGvi55yNn7kyTSQMiGLDB52F7Ml3p1MMPfDb7C0I9WYBuK8+XSXZD IeuBmU1jF9A6gQBMO1Nsh6EBCkWvl9wa9FR5RDJT0Cjzng20yjX380Voi6ZWUAFx+cbT rtXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i9meeabV8uJYazL6yMMZ7QuBcTFePXNdQX+fH3gCExc=; b=d4M7U6qvLikCyWQ5UwWnEOnWp+W0Gu1qN7PoVijCymITGq7u4GWWtAL/SY8z98kp5+ N59uKN7jPf6oBjy1wdH2gqwr9f7jbzDxz1wIsGj/VHZrzA68HhcjDSLNoimieTRNblgE tyfEWjT+odxdYk1Mkq6bdbDfkB5nJvbeafwT5/s6ig4em6YBnTjYTfLYqt5X6i/V/APp +H6j7zLZyDRYzX/2Jfvx3jObBWqIanBzKoIIvQRYx0NOZ04TZrUSw7/L5/ACyDH800JG CJ7mHlRDFYdA5Kiso19t5CUUJ6CNw0tofarozMzYNSq/95+hegdp9Au794s2CbyAlamJ +j3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530TLVsgGnMEZwM34AM9JmuCU4i70rQAJa4JT5+utf13KIyXDA8Y iIoBztP8h+GpVGv6IaQYS0VuVeFqVScjo16eKFs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7l/KY5HC0WMjm1h7JepZD5MSL+E5evSvrq/Lz+ckWBP8zcFYa3x7UMj6p+7A0+s/2eXbCjsY07Dzevt7jKZE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:6c8:: with SMTP id u8mr6736935lff.130.1629133360773; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Shunsuke Homma <>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 02:02:29 +0900
Message-ID: <>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <>
Cc: "" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000042c00b05c9b02b09"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:02:51 -0000

Hi Joel and WG,

> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?

Yes, we should pick up and standardize a single solution for SRv6
compression. Interoperability is one of important factors for operators.
Multi-options may prevent interoperability.



On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 3:52 AM Joel M. Halpern <> wrote:

> The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts
> on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the
> working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic
> for a separate email a bit later.
> Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and
> the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
> discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
> everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
> re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
> discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their
> opinion is and an explanation of why.
> The question we are asking you to comment on is:
> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?
> Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of
> business PDT on 20-August-2021.
> Thank you,
> Joel, Jim, and Bruno
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list