Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
Chongfeng Xie <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn> Wed, 11 August 2021 03:40 UTC
Return-Path: <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A323A0F02 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UuzO3DBTnIAF for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C8D3A0F00 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.218:39108.1403003317
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-219.142.69.76 (unknown [172.18.0.218]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 3932128009D; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:40:36 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040161@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.218]) by app0025 with ESMTP id c6fa1ddcefd241ad9fe262d0a7ac08aa for jmh@joelhalpern.com; Wed Aug 11 11:40:37 2021
X-Transaction-ID: c6fa1ddcefd241ad9fe262d0a7ac08aa
X-filter-score:
X-Real-From: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.218
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
From: Chongfeng Xie <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
Message-Id: <77AB7E5D-A20E-4107-AA7E-45FCF1F20D9E@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9C1E7F29-C17C-4BF1-BCCA-CA42355C97C3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:40:32 +0800
In-Reply-To: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
References: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/_Otv7yFi8i9oxJcYhi3xjY_9fV0>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:40:50 -0000
Hi, folks, As one member of design team, I am pleased that two drafts has been produced by the members with more than 1 year effort. Support has also been received from outside of the DT during the past year, thanks. From the perspective of one operator, I believe that the standardization of one data plane for compressed SRv6 will be better for the whole industry. Best regards Chongfeng > 2021年8月5日 上午2:52,Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> 写道: > > The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on the requirements and analysis drafts. The question of how the working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate email a bit later. > > Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the perspectives being expressed. While the topic was well-raised, the discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to everyone what the purpose is. In particular, the chairs have decided to re-ask the question. We ask that even those who have responded in the discussion respond to this thread. Preferably with both what their opinion is and an explanation of why. > > The question we are asking you to comment on is: > > Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing SRv6 information? > > Please speak up. We are looking to collect responses until close of business PDT on 20-August-2021. > > Thank you, > Joel, Jim, and Bruno > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
- [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 c… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Tony Li
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Keyur Patel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- [spring] 答复: Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Lihao
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Eduard Metz
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Takuya Miyasaka
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Stefano Salsano
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Martin Horneffer
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Luis M. Contreras
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Aijun Wang
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Ville Hallivuori
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Shunsuke Homma
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… James Guichard
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Ahmed MostafaSaleh ElSawaf
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… gregory.mirsky
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Luc-Fabrice Ndifor Ngwa [ MTN Cameroon ]
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Loa Andersson
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Sales, Bernard (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Joel Halpern
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Haoyu Song
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dirk Steinberg