Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

Chongfeng Xie <> Wed, 11 August 2021 03:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A323A0F02 for <>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UuzO3DBTnIAF for <>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C8D3A0F00 for <>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clientip- (unknown []) by (HERMES) with SMTP id 3932128009D; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:40:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by app0025 with ESMTP id c6fa1ddcefd241ad9fe262d0a7ac08aa for; Wed Aug 11 11:40:37 2021
X-Transaction-ID: c6fa1ddcefd241ad9fe262d0a7ac08aa
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
From: Chongfeng Xie <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9C1E7F29-C17C-4BF1-BCCA-CA42355C97C3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.\))
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:40:32 +0800
In-Reply-To: <>
Cc: "" <>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <>
References: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:40:50 -0000

Hi, folks,
As one member of design team,  I am pleased that two drafts has been produced by the members with more than 1 year effort.  Support has also been received from outside of the DT during the past year, thanks.  From the perspective of one operator, I believe that the standardization of one data plane for compressed SRv6 will be better for the whole industry.

Best regards

> 2021年8月5日 上午2:52,Joel M. Halpern <> 写道:
> The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate email a bit later.
> Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their opinion is and an explanation of why.
> The question we are asking you to comment on is:
> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing SRv6 information?
> Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of business PDT on 20-August-2021.
> Thank you,
> Joel, Jim, and Bruno
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list