Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sat, 21 August 2021 05:09 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FD13A0B6C for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_AFFORDABLE=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id miNsZPOq5-d0 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9305F3A0B68 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id e7so11276002pgk.2 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PnUkQIp1qHmpF9fKaoa1dpVwlNLqtrdum8or27r0VoM=; b=Ipep2Agh6mja9XZsfteejRf84emm7FeF/1PGmGMM1s6sEwxmHrxu3H21eIai8MfbYO fpf57gvD0+UVxG+SvHkaHa14SFepMAf4PXQATo55qQygWmOYKd0D0OkhP0OiKYNTUKPc +kz2ZE5gTPVxRVU/Jy9Bw9Hr0A6M2y8gO2aW8W4C4T1pKdyOSCgmX+G9xNW8w37NJfTw RZx/QVi+jH47faqyD9kx9uRWYajbGQIURz7hKnkI+nOPQudg+k0Yow+gX9HCG3+6FaKT ZwFswv8AAq5E4pLFS7wvxs/KHRImEqerzQBcJEjw1zDdJIs5Xo4eFRQLeeUpyamqbXu6 RJlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PnUkQIp1qHmpF9fKaoa1dpVwlNLqtrdum8or27r0VoM=; b=dm06iUgF+3NogBaowPaJ3gM5Ou8/ciQ5MKcKU9EpW5fXEpU1hRKYEOyCHnn4JbzXe7 mooNtC7PFKzQV2taeVdVvMHza2mo1GQceCIQ0MgZDYOFP+Pr/H82AUkQDxe+wM4TFMH3 a82UTpu1Cqv1FwZLcxpA54NyUEAXHwqqshFnl+jmPIJG0L+CJ3O56AFplmgKMhm4YeiL TNaAhzEUxsqU/CRb+2yAmwXKBOkYlhhgqvij/1MjqbSMv8kPbDXNlGRtFfDKhjdYC8F1 ZIE9GyMAKouUHw+mEARlCZ8ZNXheOvxuQ3s8NZcHCVKq1Lw4ZFEsZ/nMGVlP7xv0WsQg yh4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532zV+WXuQbjiLf0I4W2GjqBOYChUN5aQ6yY9QJGf9xUIhLAOznv RZuPVWV99bugRDaRb362kISbt9RNlKOMg5Eue9o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxhO1Dz6ZHVATLaMZMDAXclZ2e43u9voYh+T0duaPg+vnmZcqdhAP+dKcIGZBXKOuEbABi6y/PkTOxYJIEYrKw=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:86d5:0:b0:3e1:abc7:890b with SMTP id h21-20020aa786d5000000b003e1abc7890bmr23103757pfo.4.1629522538102; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com> <MN2PR13MB42068A755C73048052C40CAFD2FE9@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <e95528730057454d8cae2ae86be674a5@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <e95528730057454d8cae2ae86be674a5@huawei.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 01:08:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV0Eg7RiP8HjGiDY1V2hN40bamrvA=a3eOe6F0NA1qRJGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Cc: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000983a505ca0ac81c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/dDdSgR_njlwn3JmX2jaCdlffDoM>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 05:09:07 -0000

Dear Chairs

+1 on the high cost to implementations of multiple SRv6 compression
solutions and major issue for operators on interoperability.

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:16 PM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote:

> Dear chairs,
>
> I believe the WG should standardize a single data plane solution.
>
> I fully agree with Dhruv that the cost of multiple data plane for SRv6
> compression would be unaffordable and the interoperable deployment would
> suffer from it.
>
> Best regards,
> Jie
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James
> Guichard
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 4:28 AM
> > To: Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>om>; spring@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
> >
> > Dear WG:
> >
> > If you have not already done so please do provide your comments to the
> > mailing list as soon as possible.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jim, Joel & Bruno
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 2:52 PM
> > To: spring@ietf.org
> > Subject: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
> >
> > The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts
> on
> > the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the working
> > group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a
> separate
> > email a bit later.
> >
> > Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and
> the
> > perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
> > discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
> > everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
> > re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
> > discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their
> opinion
> > is and an explanation of why.
> >
> > The question we are asking you to comment on is:
> >
> > Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> > compressing SRv6 information?
> >
> > Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of
> business
> > PDT on 20-August-2021.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Joel, Jim, and Bruno
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spring mailing list
> > spring@ietf.org
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
> > w.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjames.
> > n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C250776c6aff74c568c8a08d957790ab9%7C
> > 0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637636999654946952
> > %7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL
> > CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=JyUjJng7gmClXGUs
> > Ll9AV6YWYWLQUFpmTPud8%2F0LRWE%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spring mailing list
> > spring@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*