Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sat, 21 August 2021 05:09 UTC
Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FD13A0B6C for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_AFFORDABLE=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id miNsZPOq5-d0 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9305F3A0B68 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id e7so11276002pgk.2 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PnUkQIp1qHmpF9fKaoa1dpVwlNLqtrdum8or27r0VoM=; b=Ipep2Agh6mja9XZsfteejRf84emm7FeF/1PGmGMM1s6sEwxmHrxu3H21eIai8MfbYO fpf57gvD0+UVxG+SvHkaHa14SFepMAf4PXQATo55qQygWmOYKd0D0OkhP0OiKYNTUKPc +kz2ZE5gTPVxRVU/Jy9Bw9Hr0A6M2y8gO2aW8W4C4T1pKdyOSCgmX+G9xNW8w37NJfTw RZx/QVi+jH47faqyD9kx9uRWYajbGQIURz7hKnkI+nOPQudg+k0Yow+gX9HCG3+6FaKT ZwFswv8AAq5E4pLFS7wvxs/KHRImEqerzQBcJEjw1zDdJIs5Xo4eFRQLeeUpyamqbXu6 RJlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PnUkQIp1qHmpF9fKaoa1dpVwlNLqtrdum8or27r0VoM=; b=dm06iUgF+3NogBaowPaJ3gM5Ou8/ciQ5MKcKU9EpW5fXEpU1hRKYEOyCHnn4JbzXe7 mooNtC7PFKzQV2taeVdVvMHza2mo1GQceCIQ0MgZDYOFP+Pr/H82AUkQDxe+wM4TFMH3 a82UTpu1Cqv1FwZLcxpA54NyUEAXHwqqshFnl+jmPIJG0L+CJ3O56AFplmgKMhm4YeiL TNaAhzEUxsqU/CRb+2yAmwXKBOkYlhhgqvij/1MjqbSMv8kPbDXNlGRtFfDKhjdYC8F1 ZIE9GyMAKouUHw+mEARlCZ8ZNXheOvxuQ3s8NZcHCVKq1Lw4ZFEsZ/nMGVlP7xv0WsQg yh4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532zV+WXuQbjiLf0I4W2GjqBOYChUN5aQ6yY9QJGf9xUIhLAOznv RZuPVWV99bugRDaRb362kISbt9RNlKOMg5Eue9o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxhO1Dz6ZHVATLaMZMDAXclZ2e43u9voYh+T0duaPg+vnmZcqdhAP+dKcIGZBXKOuEbABi6y/PkTOxYJIEYrKw=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:86d5:0:b0:3e1:abc7:890b with SMTP id h21-20020aa786d5000000b003e1abc7890bmr23103757pfo.4.1629522538102; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com> <MN2PR13MB42068A755C73048052C40CAFD2FE9@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <e95528730057454d8cae2ae86be674a5@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <e95528730057454d8cae2ae86be674a5@huawei.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 01:08:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV0Eg7RiP8HjGiDY1V2hN40bamrvA=a3eOe6F0NA1qRJGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Cc: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000983a505ca0ac81c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/dDdSgR_njlwn3JmX2jaCdlffDoM>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 05:09:07 -0000
Dear Chairs +1 on the high cost to implementations of multiple SRv6 compression solutions and major issue for operators on interoperability. On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:16 PM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote: > Dear chairs, > > I believe the WG should standardize a single data plane solution. > > I fully agree with Dhruv that the cost of multiple data plane for SRv6 > compression would be unaffordable and the interoperable deployment would > suffer from it. > > Best regards, > Jie > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James > Guichard > > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 4:28 AM > > To: Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>; spring@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression > > > > Dear WG: > > > > If you have not already done so please do provide your comments to the > > mailing list as soon as possible. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jim, Joel & Bruno > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern > > Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 2:52 PM > > To: spring@ietf.org > > Subject: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression > > > > The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts > on > > the requirements and analysis drafts. The question of how the working > > group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a > separate > > email a bit later. > > > > Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and > the > > perspectives being expressed. While the topic was well-raised, the > > discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to > > everyone what the purpose is. In particular, the chairs have decided to > > re-ask the question. We ask that even those who have responded in the > > discussion respond to this thread. Preferably with both what their > opinion > > is and an explanation of why. > > > > The question we are asking you to comment on is: > > > > Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for > > compressing SRv6 information? > > > > Please speak up. We are looking to collect responses until close of > business > > PDT on 20-August-2021. > > > > Thank you, > > Joel, Jim, and Bruno > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spring mailing list > > spring@ietf.org > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&data=04%7C01%7Cjames. > > n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C250776c6aff74c568c8a08d957790ab9%7C > > 0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637636999654946952 > > %7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL > > CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=JyUjJng7gmClXGUs > > Ll9AV6YWYWLQUFpmTPud8%2F0LRWE%3D&reserved=0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spring mailing list > > spring@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>* *M 301 502-1347*
- [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 c… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Tony Li
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Keyur Patel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- [spring] 答复: Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Lihao
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Eduard Metz
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Takuya Miyasaka
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Stefano Salsano
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Martin Horneffer
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Luis M. Contreras
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Aijun Wang
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Ville Hallivuori
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Shunsuke Homma
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… James Guichard
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Ahmed MostafaSaleh ElSawaf
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… gregory.mirsky
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Luc-Fabrice Ndifor Ngwa [ MTN Cameroon ]
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Loa Andersson
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Sales, Bernard (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Joel Halpern
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Haoyu Song
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dirk Steinberg