IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Consensus Call on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension

Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com> Tue, 10 April 2018 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bkaduk@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4697E1271FD for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GKDmW5B72u7N for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5143212702E for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3AIAEOr022362; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 19:14:14 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Nc+IcZDw7DmejdIkbve3LVHbzGgs844XDgGhEiX4ayg=; b=QGdJW4cGge3dCxPsaHqCLszbnEJQ7qRYIuZBB+JKJXMJr979FsLwqT6LIVAZHpnwWdX1 mJwBdCdDLH4aZ1fxBmFVyJ6Sj4ERVvCEMHI7LHblKpi7isED1jA2Hyi/W9TY2cpMifwm z835hl9Bc8ZoInyVay+mjh2tRuvSU3tPE5oZZ1fR07CvLrYpsjHuYsOMIiXpfNVf2efu CU/v//T5EAJF9AI0ZWKr1fK0X5bkEGIncnLhhqdumQ+8cWZv/eBp1Hb/h5MBd4/N56FH 43IUUA2FffOPAQWfv3C5qBWOmuLsF/UgEqQArHyS+VfvsX3Aa/bNCgfK3aeUsoOCC0wc Eg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 ([96.6.114.86]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2h6uttgnu5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 19:14:14 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w3AI7cks004394; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:14:13 -0400
Received: from prod-mail-relay15.akamai.com ([172.27.17.40]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2h78phtk13-1; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:14:13 -0400
Received: from bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com (bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.19.17.86]) by prod-mail-relay15.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7971D20068; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:14:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bkaduk by bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com with local (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <bkaduk@akamai.com>) id 1f5xmW-0004h6-Hd; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:14:12 -0500
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:14:12 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Cc: TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180410181412.GO17433@akamai.com>
References: <CAOgPGoAhzEtxpW5mzmkf2kv3AcugNy0dAzhvpaqrTSuMSqWqfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdXfVQ5ZYL+dTvFeTfOaz2NNPrqxvnWuqJkxu0aaKDF_Sg@mail.gmail.com> <FF625003-7174-4F11-8AB8-7F6F2DE28C4F@dukhovni.org> <20180410164858.GK17433@akamai.com> <CAHPuVdXGyO=zUA4TJgRDkWDStr_8esuPf9HLe12XtNjJsf4JBA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdXGyO=zUA4TJgRDkWDStr_8esuPf9HLe12XtNjJsf4JBA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-04-10_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1804100172
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-04-10_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1804100172
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/T1h1bw7TCcjrf0FSxLrFFc8FUqU>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Consensus Call on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:14:18 -0000

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:25:02PM -0400, Shumon Huque wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com> wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > I concede that it remains useful to consider what the client will do
> > with the received DANE records or denial thereof, so as to not unduly
> > block off future routes for development.  But it seems at least possible
> > to take
> > a very broad view in this space, including even the possibility of
> > additional
> > TLS extensions that can modify the behavior of this one (such as a
> > modification
> > to provide pinning-like behavior).
> 
> 
> Maybe that's the best option. Advance the current document as-is. And also
> develop a separate DANE pinning extension (now'ish ..)

Perhaps, but we should come to agreement on the actual goals before we
get too far...

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email