IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 04:37 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E4F1277D2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:37:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dB38V65PZZYF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:37:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F955127148 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:37:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id v15-v6so4921805ljh.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:37:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RiG35K/16dKjW59i8lEQpoSqZ4l3tpQ91WUgykdHQj4=; b=VsF8lukCRSZwCGBpCWysg+RNX+REIdOMQ6auLR1SwNdipwgMJaEGLgA6dJyJmrvJ6k dttY/o+2SnwrmBmx7KYuBNAJtzmIh21b2UhZXTiDuPwZrN5tbqb2HFqFD6rCDObDsvaj BNLplf/Yx3u44bzSoX4N+y3vD9c6ecbN9QJcmtzwMOwk8Hd+lx4ClkDfcpg0XxA1qatG VUHanIXj6ziNneMpj6KAWSELjYqxGMqwZ8d9eJ7OhnRBPhKhQit3n1nRLrzBOhO50x12 Var3vePPBZMT6+hau5sc+JOfcPlQtFt1pa2i3i3nN8Fb6l92Y4jeu5IOsN4Ss07pN3gU Wn0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RiG35K/16dKjW59i8lEQpoSqZ4l3tpQ91WUgykdHQj4=; b=gmCvyxafJ7G0dZFjd9BqD4l6NKvTsKM8N+VDfYFgWEa5fQeITUoyAObE1Dkc5K8+Oz l9/vr4bGZQkVWwWjQnu1WSpHRU1OvihodgU7kFHZm8Q1ePoc5b8T4SAO3HF9Yq/yP+cK 9LvK9dxrsi8Y409f29ZhXkLTglvn4yXoBicces9KRrheg/VdkHZfKt3iDZyTYhSglC9h cNBnp+O7YmswGLYzMHtTwmxO0BImb/XWCwfVJ2XLBp4fhDNUbcOdcv5I5fh/L9sN+Lgr YAtAeAA2H88Bus4v4+xSxOjTZfI0sVXtwd8OX+MXA0kko0waz6t44Hhh51TCnUue4P3B EdfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLvEB80jYE+VNnBHjf3ZQNh1GlHJfbUHSUkHNpt8Oe3TbcsO7ug yBQEzLC3UHCO9tR5UsjA3DyM6aPS9Of4Z0dHnD4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eaRzmSYO7Ipr+r8z4Vyk5W5j1vD3JCazFsszMjee9mkHo0o9o9eqNoV7ucA0EA3xMN3Dzr606IV/S/CITGGtU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:478f:: with SMTP id u137-v6mr204233lja.142.1541565456418; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:37:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCQmV5agORght0XWr27kDD+OkaEZcKcaDtE8wLG0Yi-YA@mail.gmail.com> <dee0fd86-40e3-e01d-6c70-2f467759be8b@tana.it> <CABuGu1oyqtZYCZ6xde6Jq3Mc_0ABvOQ1HtVnT0BhAChN3ffmYA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZXRD6jmbZDR+ETK+N3kW96i8mChaP1yHqsqnyzYw8T3Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZXRD6jmbZDR+ETK+N3kW96i8mChaP1yHqsqnyzYw8T3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 11:37:24 +0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa6jE_0DxHZYHu7n3v2nF2b90vWGeBgJB_XyyPj0Oz-ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<kboth@drkurt.com>" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Cc: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006d8c6b057a0badf9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/2YoHVGSleu6THkAx79JIOawytiI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 04:37:41 -0000

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:08 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> My concern with this approach (which doesn't rise to the level of
> objecting to its application as a WG document, though perhaps it should) is
> that it is trending toward needing an IANA registry to be queryable in
> real-time, and I don't believe they are equipped with the infrastructure to
> provide that kind of service, nor is that likely to happen anytime soon.
>

This issue or something like it came up when I was chairing WEIRDS, so
that's where this is coming from.

There are IANA folks here at IETF this week.  I'll ask them.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email