Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 09 November 2018 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F4E130DD3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 02:58:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gn6gfwlkeM6Y for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 02:58:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12B13130DC8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 02:58:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id a5-v6so951300ioq.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 02:58:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SS1VdjSvRD09+cVmpZSv5IKksFSoZ5wFGUp1E9+H2DU=; b=YnFf9SQNtEEJ/k00Ys6eTJteiceTE6/SG1ClLWoclLYzUWWlBbK1m+CaoV2HI/a+5r wpTdu8wktWyX3RgE287Z47O3a8umJZ2UW9UWubbXMlSVycBgD/FIVmm0Kun4Am2qVlDE O+Y81AKXtvaKwK6vlS6BnxmxxbYw0zxmHKNFySLS/jhBdxR4yj0XkI3A9VqFNNg0uVEj TtlYCm9MxW4mUBzYpP/BJfZVO5s7lGZVxoom3ooGyvFI0qiUXJ7KjdsPxuXsJyE8UN77 16C1XWGjwHMp9RBUjii5MHyxYv8l1kO323YWIhhuB8leCq4laI54+DfRmmt/kOJCzA7p qa7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SS1VdjSvRD09+cVmpZSv5IKksFSoZ5wFGUp1E9+H2DU=; b=FSkx34EtqizdAr+gIOzKyuVAxIYOJg8/7uGldw8AAyEI76HTdwGwYwePC3Lkxh6qNS Swhzb5F4wLI8PWlwCTwgkegT/uU4/Dc6A0WcWLu43E+yTgGALK+xJJAZ2GZE2jYBpol2 +AJAhaM6R5iMIc55gwLeHd4mBB18jdb+ZT/jlrsIy0dVC9EqyZdTDs8pSIxWIXksaa79 SzaY3go4MMwYwutsAt3pQvpS5zYHvbd82SkSWRGITK4+5s10YhvE/ajtC/b9b+rhs4iV ATn6Sij9tJ0k78VVC2K8WSgyh1r9Rzpk+5rQlSkdijYrg2AcEQQONnUW3jhMxUNltOP9 VWQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLY79O/1vK1s913kGWzzFptsDgWJ7BSOshX9GeCraX6gk4tjxbe sTlw5tQen02rSQEGDMfmam438BTUlEDS2hv44GHXqw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dFZneZu8ZSD09Hj1dkXc60/IHAsLiAE1kHmCA2yduYfUoPjlDGPrl0DwPMqD59WoxEWgGXvKFo0fsXj0U/73c=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:de07:: with SMTP id e7-v6mr3729443iok.21.1541761108245; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 02:58:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+HnmoQqkCzwZpjqHiD7sFVc0u3E7Yc76uw6hoPsv08j2Q@mail.gmail.com> <20181109101211.B672C2008317D4@dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181109101211.B672C2008317D4@dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 05:58:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EA2wRSU0bxCNu4ez+R2q+0ZK9NF41Zgqpz4CJLNRq17A@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002f8497057a393b78"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/52jF54ORbnXDW2joT-OrOKzyQNY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 10:58:31 -0000

John's document reminded me of how CAA records are done,  They
push all the processing outside the DNS servers.
Like CAA, we should make the RRTYPE require no special resolver processing
and
then we can get the RRTYPE fairly quickly to start.


On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 5:12 AM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <
> CADyWQ+HnmoQqkCzwZpjqHiD7sFVc0u3E7Yc76uw6hoPsv08j2Q@mail.gmail.com> you
> write:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >I dug up John's old DBOUND draft to refresh myself and it's nice and
> >straightforward.  I could not find if John shard the link
> >so here it is:
> >
> >https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-levine-dbound-dns-01.txt
> >
> >(hope that is OK John)
>
> That is fine.  I thought it was pretty straightforward, too.
>
> R's,
> John
>