IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: OFFTOPIC: DNSSEC groupthink versus improving DNS

Duane at e164 dot org <duane@e164.org> Fri, 08 August 2008 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5B43A6B3A; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jL9tjJSXlZuY; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A1C3A6C9C; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KRNI7-0004QG-Jv for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:25:43 +0000
Received: from [208.82.100.153] (helo=mail.aus-biz.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <duane@e164.org>) id 1KRNI2-0004Ns-UA for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:25:41 +0000
Received: from [192.168.100.244] (dsl-48-19.qld1.net.au [125.168.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.aus-biz.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85D88FF271; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:25:40 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <489C02FC.3010904@e164.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:25:32 +1000
From: Duane at e164 dot org <duane@e164.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
CC: Ralf Weber <denic@eng.colt.net>, bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>, Namedroppers <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: OFFTOPIC: DNSSEC groupthink versus improving DNS
References: <489AD5E3.20708@nlnetlabs.nl> <20080807134236.GA19024@outpost.ds9a.nl> <E3BF6308-12F6-4269-B949-2853E5E8F607@eng.colt.net> <489BF4C8.9000309@e164.org> <09B9BDC1BA78A4C82CC20893@nimrod.local>
In-Reply-To: <09B9BDC1BA78A4C82CC20893@nimrod.local>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE7F7101EC72E72A673234889"
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>

Alex Bligh wrote:

Ignore the fact of what DNSSEC can do, ignore even what it can't do, the
bigger hurdle to getting most people to deploy it will be the ease at
which they can set it up, other external factors will occur that may
change the rate of deployment but why people aren't actively trying to
make the process as simple as possible is beyond me.

-- 

Best regards,
 Duane

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email