IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Additional filtering of responses

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Thu, 07 August 2008 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE5628C128; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TDkeu-FFyJ-p; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2383A6967; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KRCUy-000CX9-7X for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:54:16 +0000
Received: from [66.92.146.20] (helo=stora.ogud.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>) id 1KRCUu-000CWf-OQ for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:54:14 +0000
Received: from [10.31.201.66] (mail.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.6]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m77Ks3cS004528; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:54:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240800c4c10e41c8a1@[10.31.201.66]>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.10.0808072002520.18980@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <489AD5E3.20708@nlnetlabs.nl> <45759.1218122552@nsa.vix.com> <OF8C6AC1F0.001ADC24-ON8025749E.00576A89-C125749E.005ADCE2@nominet.org.uk> <a06240800c4c0e3f02e0c@[10.31.201.66]> <alpine.LSU.1.10.0808072002520.18980@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:44:05 -0400
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Subject: Re: Additional filtering of responses
Cc: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>, Namedroppers <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 10.20.30.4
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>

At 20:03 +0100 8/7/08, Tony Finch wrote:
>On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Edward Lewis wrote:
>
>>  What bothers me about this is that the SERVER: address is not in 
>>the list (of
>>  1) addresses authoritative for the zone owning the QNAME. (That 
>>is, 192.0.2.10
>>  is not 192.0.2.9.)
>
>dig's server is the rDNS, not the aDNS.

Ok, but still, the aa bit would then make me do some more sanity 
checking if I were paranoid.

Is(n't) it true that BIND 9 no longer sets AA bit on answers a'coming 
through the cache?
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Never confuse activity with progress.  Activity pays more.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email