IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: OFFTOPIC: DNSSEC groupthink versus improving DNS

Duane at e164 dot org <duane@e164.org> Fri, 08 August 2008 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8013E3A6CBD; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VesTTfEtYkNA; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42B23A6C9C; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KRNJv-0004hR-QB for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:27:35 +0000
Received: from [208.82.100.153] (helo=mail.aus-biz.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <duane@e164.org>) id 1KRNJs-0004f3-Dg for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:27:33 +0000
Received: from [192.168.100.244] (dsl-48-19.qld1.net.au [125.168.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.aus-biz.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2475EFF26C; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:27:34 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <489C0370.4080502@e164.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:27:28 +1000
From: Duane at e164 dot org <duane@e164.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ralf Weber <denic@eng.colt.net>
CC: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>, Namedroppers <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: OFFTOPIC: DNSSEC groupthink versus improving DNS
References: <489AD5E3.20708@nlnetlabs.nl> <20080807134236.GA19024@outpost.ds9a.nl> <E3BF6308-12F6-4269-B949-2853E5E8F607@eng.colt.net> <489BF4C8.9000309@e164.org> <B786FB32-89AB-412E-A502-1CEB9A404041@eng.colt.net>
In-Reply-To: <B786FB32-89AB-412E-A502-1CEB9A404041@eng.colt.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>

Ralf Weber wrote:

> Well this might happen more often now when the hackers do code that
> utilises Dan Kaminskys findings. And it just need to happen to the
> "right" people, as we see with IPv6 now that which is at least getting
> some traction after governments endorsed it.

Either that or they all migrated to recursors that weren't affected and
so that would mitigate any migration to DNSSEC.

-- 

Best regards,
 Duane

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email