IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Additional filtering of responses

Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> Thu, 07 August 2008 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014DA3A6A86; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMCUMHWMI6mf; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A2A3A6AFD; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KRENw-000OUl-NX for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:55:08 +0000
Received: from [2001:4f8:3:bb:230:48ff:fe5a:2f38] (helo=nsa.vix.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <vixie@vix.com>) id 1KRENs-000OTw-JZ for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:55:06 +0000
Received: from nsa.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nsa.vix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113ABA6682; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 22:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vixie@nsa.vix.com)
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
To: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, Namedroppers <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:44:05 -0400." <a06240800c4c10e41c8a1@[10.31.201.66]>
References: <489AD5E3.20708@nlnetlabs.nl> <45759.1218122552@nsa.vix.com> <OF8C6AC1F0.001ADC24-ON8025749E.00576A89-C125749E.005ADCE2@nominet.org.uk> <a06240800c4c0e3f02e0c@[10.31.201.66]> <alpine.LSU.1.10.0808072002520.18980@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <a06240800c4c10e41c8a1@[10.31.201.66]>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nil; GNU Emacs 22.2.1
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:54:56 +0000
Message-ID: <5610.1218149696@nsa.vix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Vix-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner-ID: 113ABA6682.AA8DD
X-Vix-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Vix-MailScanner-From: vixie@vix.com
Subject: Re: Additional filtering of responses
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>

> Is(n't) it true that BIND 9 no longer sets AA bit on answers a'coming
> through the cache?

yes.  everything is cached and regenerated.  bind9 RDNS never sets AA.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email