Re: OFFTOPIC: DNSSEC groupthink versus improving DNS

[Duane <[e-mail]>]

Paul Vixie wrote:
> duane, if your point is that dnssec is horrid misshapen pig that even
> its mother could not love, then you will find noone (anywhere) willing
> to argue otherwise.  it's late, it's ugly, it's fragile, it's a pig,
> and that's the universal view of it, there are no dissenters.

No arguments here.

> but having ridden the whole ride and having seen victory declared several
> times, i am in the "it can be made to work in its present form without any
> more flag days" camp.  call that groupthink if you must, say what you want
> about me, but say also that i hate dnssec but plan to deploy it anyway.

I most sincerely apologise if I made any person comment to or about you
that most certainly was not my intention. I like everyone else want a
solution to this and other problems with DNS but for a number of reasons
I don't like the form it's taken in DNSSEC.

I'm trying to stick to the non-political factual reasons for my concerns
over it, however it wouldn't be terribly difficult to figure out other
concerns I have with it.

-- 

Best regards,
 Duane

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>