IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 17 July 2014 02:28 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78921A0439 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8nBPWyp5wBRu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C380E1A040C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1X7bQs-0003Km-5o; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:28:30 +0000
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:28:29 +0900
Message-ID: <m2pph4d8he.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20140716161255.0ac7a6f0@elandnews.com>
References: <20140714164212.22974.20340.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140716100922.0ceba268@resistor.net> <53C70443.8020709@dcrocker.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20140716161255.0ac7a6f0@elandnews.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3Rg410fUeJc6jBUQXxmGb3QIC8k
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:28:36 -0000

> I'll quote from 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg13031.html
> 
>    "Existing deployment of DMARC has demonstrated utility at internet
>     scale"

indeed it has, except in a negative sort of way.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email