Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)

[[e-mail] (Martin Rex)]

>Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>>Yes, but how does (or should) your comment affect the draft charter text?
 
 
S Moonesamy wrote:
>
> I'll quote from 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg13031.html
> 
>    "Existing deployment of DMARC has demonstrated utility at internet
>     scale"

I would propose to adjust this statement to better match reality.

>    "Existing deployment of DMARC has demonstrated moderate success
>    for some providers and some parts of the internet, and at the
>    same time interferes fatally with mailing list usage of
>    DMARC-affected EMail user accounts and mail forwarding.
>
>    But the by far most serious problem is that processing of EMail
>    according to DMARC by a telecommunicatios service provider
>    is a real and serious criminal offense in countries with strong
>    protections of fundamental human rights, such as many member
>    countries of the European Union, and this precludes that
>    DMARC could ever scale to the entire internet.


-Martin