Re: DMARC and ietf.org

Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Mon, 15 August 2016 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C8312D114 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bBbQgsD3TLe6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B44D212D0AC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.15.1/8.14.9) with SMTP id u7FK5RhG028107 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:05:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:05:27 -0400
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DMARC and ietf.org
Message-ID: <20160815200527.GA20177@gsp.org>
References: <CC6156F0-83C6-4E18-80F9-B0B4FAD13621@vigilsec.com> <20160722091247.10696.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160722091247.10696.qmail@ary.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9STmslQrD5Fg9Vj-s9cLz0eGSCo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:05:31 -0000

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 09:12:47AM -0000, John Levine wrote:
> I've found that the best place to do anti-DMARC stuff is in a shim
> between the list package and the sendmail program, since it can do
> whatever you want to the message and it still works when you upgrade
> the list software.

Do you recommend this on the inbound or outbound side?  That is: before
the MTA hands off to the MLM, or after the MLM hands off to the MTA?

---rsk