Re: Blue sheet harvest

Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU> Fri, 04 April 2008 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516BF28C46C; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E893D28C476; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spXWS-X1C0Q8; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B8E28C3AB; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m34Io8Y2025909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m34Io8mG025908; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:50:08 -0700
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Blue sheet harvest
Message-ID: <20080404185008.GA22176@boreas.isi.edu>
References: <20080404035231.GA23412@boreas.isi.edu> <20080404110841.9026384624D@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080404110841.9026384624D@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: bmanning@boreas.isi.edu
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, bmanning@ISI.EDU
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:08:41AM -0400, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
> < it started w/ folsk scanning the pages of the early bound
> < copies of IETFF proceedings.
> 
> the sheets are no longer included in the proceedings

	right - the point is that this has been a problem 
	for years.

> > the process you describe has happend in recent memory at more than
> > one IETF.  
> 
> at what scale?  100s of people? 10s?

	since i don't tend to read other peoples email,
	i can only answer for myself.  

	perhaps a survey might be in order - or, consider
	that it is not a problem (for you) so its not a
	significant problem for anyone else.

> Scott

	that said, i see no real reason to collect the email
	address.  and signing the sheet is strictly voluntary...
	to date.

-- 
--bill

Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf