Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Fri, 04 April 2008 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698D13A68B7; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BA23A68B7 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y-wPJ+LGooRi for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866613A687C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:720:410:1001:21b:63ff:fe92:9fbb] ([IPv6:2001:720:410:1001:21b:63ff:fe92:9fbb]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m348iJbf051868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:44:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <30AD1557-09AE-4828-8E92-2E0DBEE8632A@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <47F56545.4020603@isoc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Subject: Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:44:25 +0200
References: <47F56545.4020603@isoc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 4 apr 2008, at 1:16, Ray Pelletier wrote:

> We are considering changing the meeting Blue Sheet by eliminating the
> need to enter an email address to avoid spam concerns.

> Is there any good reason to retain that info bit?

If the email address is useful for uniqueness and legibility issues,  
then why not replace it with an attendee number? If this is printed on  
the badge it's readily available when signing the blue sheets, and  
four or less digits take less time to write down and should be easier  
to decipher than an alphanumeric string.
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf