Re: Blue sheet harvest

Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU> Fri, 04 April 2008 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5B53A6B86; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595FF3A6A47; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12E5-O-h3I6k; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (BISCAYNE-ONE-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646653A6EDA; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id m34JEGqs016287; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:14:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from closure.thunk.org (c-98-216-98-217.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.216.98.217]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id m34JE9Qb012214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:14:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tytso by closure.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <tytso@mit.edu>) id 1JhrMX-0005hC-AU; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:14:09 -0400
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:14:08 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: Blue sheet harvest
Message-ID: <20080404191408.GE29297@mit.edu>
References: <20080404035231.GA23412@boreas.isi.edu> <20080404110841.9026384624D@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <20080404185008.GA22176@boreas.isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080404185008.GA22176@boreas.isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:50:08AM -0700, Bill Manning wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:08:41AM -0400, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
> > < it started w/ folsk scanning the pages of the early bound
> > < copies of IETFF proceedings.
> > 
> > the sheets are no longer included in the proceedings
> 
> 	right - the point is that this has been a problem 
> 	for years.

How is this a problem if the pages are no longer being included?

Do people seriously think (or fear) they are are getting scanned in
the room?

Or the Secretariat is scanning them and selling them to list brokers
to fund the cookies and soda?  :-)

It seems almost as if this is more of a perception problem than one
where there is an actual issue with e-mails going to spammers given
the current arrangement.

					- Ted
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf