Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal
Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com> Fri, 04 April 2008 19:10 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0B128C1C0; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8190D28C1C0; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKCaI2MvxMzH; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from romeo.rtfm.com (unknown [74.95.2.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F1C28C75D; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from romeo.rtfm.com (localhost.rtfm.com [127.0.0.1]) by romeo.rtfm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA46E5081A; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:08:12 -0700
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
To: Michael Thomas <mat@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal
In-Reply-To: <47F64FFE.9020701@cisco.com>
References: <20080404001012.31E33843A22@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <20080404004447.1103E5081A@romeo.rtfm.com> <47F64FFE.9020701@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Message-Id: <20080404190812.AA46E5081A@romeo.rtfm.com>
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
At Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:57:50 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: > > Eric Rescorla wrote: > > At Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:10:12 -0400 (EDT), > > Scott O. Bradner wrote: > > > >> Ole guessed > >> > >>> My understanding is that the blue sheet serves mainly as a record of > >>> "who was in the room" which I think is largely used to plan room > >>> capacities for the next meeting. > >>> > >> the "blue sheets" are required as part of the basic openness > >> process in a standards organization - there is a need to know > >> "who is in the room" (see RFC 2418 section 3.1 for the actual > >> requirement) > >> > >> the blue sheets become part of the formal record of the standards > >> process and can be retrieved if needed (e.g. in a lawsuit) but are not > >> generally made available > >> > >> as pointed out by Mark Andrews - email addresses can be useful in > >> determining the actual identity of the person who scrawled their > >> name on the sheet - so it is an advantage to retain them > >> > >> I'm trying to understand how the blue sheets contribute in any > >> significant way to the spam problem - someone whould have to be > >> surreptitiously copying them or quickly writing down the email > >> addresses - both could happen but do not seem to be all that > >> likely there are far more efficient ways to grab email addresses > >> > >> so, my question is "is this a problem that needs solving"? > >> > > > > The only reason I've heard is that some claim that people don't > > write their names on the blue sheets out of concern over spam. > > > This doesn't seem very reasonable to me... if you post on any public > list -- like this one -- your likelihood for harvest is far, far higher. > Let's > face it, in 2008 trying to have "private" email addresses as a spam defense > strategy is oh so 1998. Oh, I agree. My only argument here would be that if people actually do this in significant numbers that accomodating them might be easier than educating them. -Ekr _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: Blue sheet harvest Bill Manning
- Blue Sheet Change Proposal Ray Pelletier
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Mark Andrews
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Eric Burger
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Eric Rescorla
- RE: Blue Sheet Change Proposal john.loughney
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Cullen Jennings
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Eric Rescorla
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Rob Austein
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Alain Durand
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Samuel Weiler
- RE: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Dave Crocker
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal john.loughney
- RE: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Dave Crocker
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Blue sheet harvest Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Barry Leiba
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Suresh Krishnan
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Mr Kim Sanders
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Tony Hansen
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Michael Thomas
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Dave Crocker
- Re: Blue sheet harvest Bill Manning
- Re: Blue sheet harvest Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Eric Rescorla
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Derek Atkins
- Re: Blue sheet harvest Theodore Tso
- Re: Blue sheet harvest Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal John C Klensin
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Bill Manning
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal David Conrad
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal John C Klensin
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal John Levine
- Re: Blue sheet harvest Bill Manning
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Bill Manning
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Marshall Eubanks
- Attendee lists in proceedings [Re: Blue Sheet Cha… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Blue sheet harvest Hadriel Kaplan
- The purpose of blue sheets [Re: Blue sheet harves… Pekka Savola
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal John G. Scudder
- RE: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Richard Shockey
- RE: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Dean Anderson
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal TS Glassey
- Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal Dean Anderson