IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal

Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org> Fri, 04 April 2008 03:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D8D28C434; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1783728C6A0 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KYjJgkc+8rmp for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BD928C6EE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m341TrW2026785; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:29:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from weiler@watson.org)
Received: from localhost (weiler@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m341Tq9C026780; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:29:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from weiler@watson.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: weiler owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:29:52 -0400
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org>
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
Subject: Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal
In-Reply-To: <47F56545.4020603@isoc.org>
Message-ID: <20080403212412.N21475@fledge.watson.org>
References: <47F56545.4020603@isoc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:29:53 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:59:33 -0700
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Ray Pelletier wrote:

> Is there any good reason to retain that info bit?

No.

I have no objection to the change, though I'd make it in the interest 
of streamlining the blue sheet process rather than to avoid spam. The 
faster one can deal with the blue sheet, the less likely it is to be 
ignored.

Addressing the "is this a problem": I have at points stumbled across 
the typed-in contents of blue sheets on the web.

-- Sam

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email