IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Wed, 26 March 2008 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9FE28C7C9; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.514, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EZ1hKI2HM30D; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BAF28C196; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F19B3A6E23 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XucK0ipSIJyy for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from virtualized.org (trantor.virtualized.org [204.152.189.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF5F3A6D1D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wlan39-047.mdr.icann.org (wlan39-047.mdr.icann.org [192.0.39.47]) by virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A93D1197DE; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <788AE550-EDC8-4745-9625-6F0649B82B08@virtualized.org>
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <47EACFB4.5010100@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:53:37 -0700
References: <20080326150139.86203.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <47EA8CD8.3010500@network-heretics.com> <alpine.BSF.1.00.0803261436260.36932@simone.iecc.com> <11a101c88f75$96b63bd0$c422b370$@net> <47EAB7E3.4060308@dcrocker.net> <47EACFB4.5010100@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

On Mar 26, 2008, at 3:35 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> It seems there are two ways of looking at this:
>
> (1) AAAA records in the IPv6 world should do exactly same things as A
> records in the IPv4 world,
...

I don't really have a strong opinion on the whether or not AAAAs  
should be used for email address resolution. However, it might be  
worthwhile to point out that since IPv6 has no significant benefit to  
the vast majority of users to drive acceptance, I suspect that from a  
network administrator's point of view, every time IPv6 is not treated  
the same way IPv4 is, you are adding an impediment to IPv6 deployment.

Regards,
-drc

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email