Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1))

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 11 December 2007 17:00 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J28Sq-0008KR-Ax; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:00:12 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J28Sp-0008Jq-EO for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:00:11 -0500
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J28So-0002Gu-RZ for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:00:11 -0500
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC4825978D; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:00:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29412-04; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:59:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.16.100] (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5878B259780; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:59:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:10:40 -0800
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <43B8E5E553E5D4375D744E34@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
In-Reply-To: <01MOQB3814UM00BDC1@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <E1IwpJr-0007aa-OQ@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <fjft2g$a68$1@ger.gmane.org> <p06250146c382498c24bc@[192.17.144.29]> <01MOQB3814UM00BDC1@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Cc: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1))
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


--On 10. desember 2007 15:22 -0800 Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> wrote:

>> 2. The mailing lists described in 2821 are very simple redistribution
>> lists, as opposed to the "fairly sophisticated forums for group
>> communication" [2919] described in these documents. For simple
>> aliasing and redistribution lists, I think the "MUST be left
>> unchanged" is appropriate.
>
> The key point is that this is redistribution prior to final delivery.
> Sophisticated list processors in effect submit a new message to the
> transport
> infrastructure and do not fall under this prohibition.

Would it be a reasonable thing to add a note saying that "there exist 
things that call themselves lists but are doing processing other than what 
is described here; such lists should be described as delivery followed by a 
submission, and alterations are therefore outside the rules"?

I'd also be happy with losing the normative language about what lists do 
apart from replacing MAIL FROM; I don't see an upside to having the 
prohibition in here for lists, since it doesn't match widespread practice. 
(I do want to keep the prohibition for aliases!)

> Now, having said this, the minor one issue I do see with section 3.10 is
> that
> the "lists MUST change the envelope from" requirement is actually a
> tautology:
> Lists as distinct from aliases as defined as redistributors that change
> the
> envelope from address. The requirement that lists do the one thing that
> defines
> them appears to have originated in the department of redundancy
> department.

My memory claims that it originated in the department of terminology war 
peace negotiations - when faced with having to come up with a definition of 
"alias" and "list", the group settled for "if it alters MAIL FROM, it's a 
list, if it doesn't, it's an alias". Thus, the real point of the section is 
the terminology (he said, redundantly).

               Harald



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf