Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Wed, 26 March 2008 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DFD28C1D1; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wdJb-4CO1w1w; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FEA3A6CD3; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41A43A6D2F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YCXJr+noXorJ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (dsl-66-59-230-40.static.linkline.com [66.59.230.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BC53A6C93 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01MSURER05F40008UE@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01MSTEIPBSLS00007A@mauve.mrochek.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01MSURCC6YP800007A@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:08:30 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:18:53 -0400" <47E9C09D.8020900@network-heretics.com>
References: <01MSSXWZKKZ800007A@mauve.mrochek.com> <fs9blg$9in$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080325133807.GA12616@boreas.isi.edu> <fsb3lo$gsd$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080326023117.GA26917@boreas.isi.edu> <01MSUMMIXZRA00007A@mauve.mrochek.com> <47E9C09D.8020900@network-heretics.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve; t=1206508322; h=Date: From:Subject:MIME-version:Content-type; b=CbIqDJu+UOUuIu0J1PudyXR3u 8dGrvjf3X1ByI3qAUJH4Y3DebiqF3bnHwa0mNi6eVeTcYe4pkggel+HtAjhoA==
Cc: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, ietf@ietf.org, Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


> Ned Freed wrote:
> >> 	er, NO.  SMTP has no dependence on what may or may
> >> 	not exist in the DNS.  Forcing SMTP to depend on DNS
> >> 	is a huge mistake.  And yes Virginia, I plan on removing
> >> 	A rr's from my zones (eventually)
> >
> > You know, that's a very interesting point. One of more common configuration
> > variations we see is to disable MX lookups and just use address records.

> how does anyone expect that to work across administrative domains?

The usual reason for it is exactly that: To get things to work across ADMDs
where stuff is otherwise messed up, services are unavailable, etc.

Look, I'm not advocating the practice. All I'm saying is that people find
it necesary to do fairly frequently.

				Ned
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf